2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 2019
DOI: 10.23919/mipro.2019.8756806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clustering model for time-series forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we experimentally evaluated and demonstrated that our approach outperforms the pollen calendar method, which is typically used in modern pollen prediction systems. In addition, we show that our method outperforms pollen predictions based on patterns [5] and the naive approach that predicts concentration for a given day by copying the pollen concentration seen on the previous day.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, we experimentally evaluated and demonstrated that our approach outperforms the pollen calendar method, which is typically used in modern pollen prediction systems. In addition, we show that our method outperforms pollen predictions based on patterns [5] and the naive approach that predicts concentration for a given day by copying the pollen concentration seen on the previous day.…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Pollen concentrations were collected using the 7-day volumetric For the experiments, the following meteorological data was used: minimal daily temperature (MNT), maximal daily temperature (MKT), precipitation (PAD), relative humidity (VLZ), and maximum daily wind speed (MBV). For every of the three pollen types, all three models (PollenNet, RM, and SM strategy) described in section 2 were used, and the obtained results are compared to the pollen calendar, the naive model, and the prediction based on patterns ( [5]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%