2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(02)00223-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closer look at the ductile–brittle transition in solid particle erosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
2
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
66
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the mass loss is found to attain a peak at 4.5 ms -1 (0.21 g) at 60°. The change of environment has a significant impact; factors such as erodent particle, impact angle and the impact velocity increase the mass loss, attaining a peak at intermediate impact angles [14,15]. The reduction of the mass change at higher velocities, i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Impingement Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the mass loss is found to attain a peak at 4.5 ms -1 (0.21 g) at 60°. The change of environment has a significant impact; factors such as erodent particle, impact angle and the impact velocity increase the mass loss, attaining a peak at intermediate impact angles [14,15]. The reduction of the mass change at higher velocities, i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Impingement Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies focused on the combination of top-down surface patterning with self-assembly of particles via electrostatic Chapter 2 22 interactions. For example, patterning by photolithography, [33] soft lithography, [34] nanoimprint lithography, [35] and scanning probe lithography [36] have been widely used for the fabrication of electrostatically assembled nanoparticles on patterned surfaces.…”
Section: Assembly Of Nanoparticles On Samsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For higher impact angle (60 and 90 ), the resolved normal stress is higher, that provides bigger indented force to forming extrusion lips and cracks but the eroded pieces remove difficult than that impinge at medium and lower angles due to the lower shear stress, and as a consequence, the erosion rates reduce. The maximum erosion rate occurs at the angle of 45 , which shows that the two-phase material mixed with martensite and ferrite causes the angle of maximum erosion rate being neither close to [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] observed in ductile materials [1][2][3][4] nor at normal angle reported in brittle materials. 5,6) When the effect of reduction is considered, the erosion rates decrease with increasing reduction and are lower than those of direct quenched and tempered samples for all impact angles.…”
Section: Erosion Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two models have been employed to describe the erosion behavior for ductile materials and brittle materials respectively. Ductile erosion occurs by ploughing, micromachining and cutting, [1][2][3][4] and maximum erosion rates occur for impact at $20{30…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%