A closer look at personal values and delinquency

Borg, Ingwer; Hermann, Dieter; Bilsky, Wolfgang

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.043

Cited by 55 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Its fit is good (stress = .181) and significant (p = 0.00 in a permutation test; Mair et al, 2016). It also replicates previous findings and is theory-compatible (Borg et al, 2017b). The configuration in Fig.…”

Section: Multidimensional Scaling Of Irvs and Pvq Items And Indexessupporting

confidence: 91%

“…The obvious hypothesis is that the PVQ scale fits better to the value circle theory, and the IVRS fits better to the value dimensions theory, because the scales have been developed out of these theories. Previous research (Bilsky & Hermann, 2016;Borg et al, 2017bBorg et al, , 2017c has shown that the IRVS fits well into the value circle framework. What has not been tested is whether the PVQ fits into Klages' value dimensions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 83%

“…With the values in between, you can grade the importance of the issues." Table 1 shows Bilsky and Hermann's (2016) codings 3based on inter-rater agreement of experts in value research-of the IRVS items in terms of Schwartz's Theory of Universals in Values (TUV) into 10 "basic values" and into 2 extra value types, "peace of mind" and "religion," added by Borg et al (2017b). The 33 items are culled from the 37 IRV items (dropping 4 items because raters did not reach agreement on their coding, as shown in Table 1).…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Do the PVQ and the IRVS scales for personal values support Schwartz’s value circle model or Klages’ value dimensions model?

Borg¹,

Hermann

Bilsky³

et al. 2019

Meas Instrum Soc Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper compares the theoretical implications of two popular scales for the measurement of personal values, the Portrait Values Questionnaire (PVQ) of Schwartz et al. (J Cross-Cult Psychol, 32:519-542, 2001) and the IRVS of Hermann (Werte und Kriminalität: Konzeption einer allgemeinen Kriminalitätstheorie [Values and criminality: conception of a general theory of criminality], 2003; Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen, 2014). These scales come from psychology and sociology, respectively. They were developed, independently of each other, to serve different purposes, are based on different theories, and use different statistical models. We here study the validity of each scale for either theory. It is shown that using the PVQ methodology leads to similar and robust model solutions for data collected with either scale. Conversely, using the methodology that is standard for Individual Reflexive Value Scale (IRVS) data confirms the theoretical predictions for PVQ data but leads to unstable solutions for IRVS data. Nevertheless, the IRVS suggests "peace of mind" as an additional basic value and items that serve to complement the PVQ value circle. "Religion" is found to also fit into the structure of basic PVQ values but it contains a unique component.

show abstract

Section: Multidimensional Scaling Of Irvs and Pvq Items And Indexessupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 83%

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Do the PVQ and the IRVS scales for personal values support Schwartz’s value circle model or Klages’ value dimensions model?

Borg¹,

Hermann

Bilsky³

et al. 2019

Meas Instrum Soc Sci

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(2011), McQuilkin et al. (2016) and Borg et al. (2017), it would be worthwhile to perform multidimensional scaling (MDS) confirmatory analysis to examine the spatial relationship between the different values.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the third-order structuring of Shalom Schwartz’s theory of basic human values

Giménez

Tamajón

2019

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Shalom Schwartz's Theory of Basic Human Values is one of the most commonly used and tested transcultural theories in the field of behavioural research. This theory has been refined since the 1980s to reach its most recent version, from 2012. The underlying reason for this theory's continuous evolution is that it assumes that values form a circular motivational continuum, meaning that the items do not have exact limits between the values and thus have a shared load on more than one, giving rise to multicollinearity. Additionally, measuring as they do different aspects, each value is multidimensional, thereby reducing internal consistency coefficients. The refined version represents an attempt to reduce or even eliminate these problems. Nevertheless, to date, on only one occasion has a confirmatory factor analysis been performed to permit validation of this refined version's third-order structuring. The objective of this study is, then, to perform a validation analysis of said structuring, albeit in a different social context and for another geographical scope of action.

show abstract

“…Favorable patterns to the violation of rules/laws increase the chances of engaging in criminal behavior (Intravia et al, 2017;McNeeley, Meldrum & Hoskin, 2018;O'Riordan & O'Connell, 2014). Conversely, beliefs, values and attitudes that denote the valorization of rules and the importance of impulse control, in the sense of meeting society's expectations, have a negative association with divergent and criminal behavior (Bilsky & Hermann, 2016;Borg, Hermann & Bilsky, 2017). These aspects constitute the "Antisocial Cognition" (Bonta & Wormith, 2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Maladjustment and Criminal Behavior Pattern Changes in Adolescents in Conflict with the Law

Galinari

Costa

Komatsu

et al. 2020

Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Personality aspects that present a risk for criminal conducts are susceptible to changes. This study aimed to identify the profile of adolescents in conflict with the law based on the Social Maladjustment (SM) construct, to describe patterns of criminal conducts, and to verify the continuity and change on these variables, in a longitudinal prospective study. A sample of 78 adolescents answered to the Jesness Inventory - revised in Brazil and to the Questionnaire of Youth Behaviors, at two collection times (W1 and W2). The profiles were identified with latent class growth analysis and the behavior patterns were compared with Student’s t test. Two classes were obtained: High SM and Normative SM. At W1, SM high scores were associated to high frequency in the perpetration of crimes and both classes had lower SM at W2. The results point to the possibility of changes in SM and in conduct over time.

show abstract

A closer look at personal values and delinquency

Cited by 55 publications

References 22 publications

Do the PVQ and the IRVS scales for personal values support Schwartz’s value circle model or Klages’ value dimensions model?

Do the PVQ and the IRVS scales for personal values support Schwartz’s value circle model or Klages’ value dimensions model?

Analysis of the third-order structuring of Shalom Schwartz’s theory of basic human values

Social Maladjustment and Criminal Behavior Pattern Changes in Adolescents in Conflict with the Law

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About