“…To better understand the RCC results, the RCF industry initiated a series of investigations designed to characterize the material tested, measure/model the fiber dosimetry, and estimate possible occupational risks (see, e.g., Brown et al, 2005;Maxim et al, 2003;Moolgavkar et al, 1999Moolgavkar et al, , 2000Turim and Brown, 2003;Yu et al, 1995Yu et al, , 1996Yu and Oberdörster 2000). Subsequent analyses of the RCF RCC data were consistent with the hypothesis that "lung overload" occurred (Bellmann et al, 2001;Brown et al, 2000Brown et al, , 2005Mast et al, 2000aMast et al, , 2000bYu and Oberdöster, 2000;Yu et al, 1994aYu et al, , 1994bYu et al, , 1995aYu et al, , 1995bYu et al, , 1996, an unintended artifact of the method used to prepare RCFs for testing and the ratio of particles to fibers was not representative of that found in workplace samples (and significantly higher than those for other SVFs tested).…”