1995
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(93)e0238-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification of formulations for the (time-dependent) traveling salesman problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Let I(S, p) be an alternating independent set and (i, j, t) ∈ A with 1 ≤ t ≤ n − 2. Then the facet defined by inequality (10) for I(S, p) and the facet defined by inequality (4) for (i, j, t) are not the same.…”
Section: Lemma 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let I(S, p) be an alternating independent set and (i, j, t) ∈ A with 1 ≤ t ≤ n − 2. Then the facet defined by inequality (10) for I(S, p) and the facet defined by inequality (4) for (i, j, t) are not the same.…”
Section: Lemma 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results for the STSP are surveyed in [13] and for the ATSP in [3]. Formulations for the TDTSP have been proposed or studied in [23,20,7,10,29,9]. Exact algorithms for the TDTSP are presented in [20,4,29] and, for the special case of the TDP, in [6,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first formulation (therein P1) has 4n constraints, whereas the second formulation (hereafter P1b) has 3n constraints and is obtained from the first one by dropping a set of n constraints. Thus, the LP relaxation of the first formulation is stronger than that of the second one; Gouveia and Voß [1995] showed that the LP relaxations of both formulations are stronger than that of GG. The third formulation proposed by Fox et al (therein P2) has n + 1 constraints and is obtained from the first formulation by surrogating the first 3n constraints.…”
Section: Review Of Polynomial Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some of the time staged formulations have also been compared by Gouveia and Voss (1995) and discussed by Picard and Queyranne (1978). The sequential formulation has also been improved by Gouveia and Pires (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%