2012
DOI: 10.2192/ursus-d-11-00026.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A circumpolar monitoring framework for polar bears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 234 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, do the identified indicators adequately measure the effects of the top concern, climate change, on polar bear health? A substantial amount of the current polar bear research is related to population ecology studies (e.g., Vongraven et al, 2012), and the generated list of indicators important for health closely aligns with data collected for those studies. It is possible that these data best reflect polar bear health, but it is also important to consider that the results of a Delphi exercise inherently reflect the specialties represented on the panel (Goluchowicz and Blind, 2011;Hus and Sandford, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, do the identified indicators adequately measure the effects of the top concern, climate change, on polar bear health? A substantial amount of the current polar bear research is related to population ecology studies (e.g., Vongraven et al, 2012), and the generated list of indicators important for health closely aligns with data collected for those studies. It is possible that these data best reflect polar bear health, but it is also important to consider that the results of a Delphi exercise inherently reflect the specialties represented on the panel (Goluchowicz and Blind, 2011;Hus and Sandford, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Table 4 Condensed list of important metrics and indicators to monitor polar bear health enumerated in the first round questionnaire, and the mean, median, and range of the second round scores rating each metric/indicator on a scale of 1 to 10 where 1 = "the metric is of little to no importance to monitor polar bear health" and 10 = "the metric is of utmost importance to monitor health in polar bears." Polar bears are a sentinel species in the Arctic ecosystem through which the cumulative effects of current and future stressors may be studied (Stirling and Derocher, 1993;Vongraven et al, 2012). Cumulative effects studies explore the impact of independent and interacting risk factors from multiple sources (Moore and Huntington, 2008;Ragan et al, 2008).…”
Section: Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A background paper was presented at the working group's biennial meeting in February 2011 (Vongraven & Peacock 2011), and a circumpolar monitoring framework has been developed (Vongraven et al 2012). This framework identifies several threats and stressors to polar bear populations, identifies recommended monitoring parameters and knowledge gaps and suggests how to fill these gaps and improve monitoring.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%