IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. Digest. Held in Conjunction With: USNC/CNC/URSI North American R
DOI: 10.1109/aps.2003.1220087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A circularly polarized, electrically scanned slotted waveguide array suitable for high temperature environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pure circular polarization corresponds to an axial ratio of unity for the orthogonal linear electric vectors, meaning no intrinsic linear polarization and therefore no capability to detect FR. However, the MESSENGER transmitter system exhibited a small departure from this ideal state at the nominal operating frequency [ Stilwell et al ., ] corresponding to linear polarization of about 11%, or sometimes more depending on propagation effects. This value is comparable to percentage linear polarization established for extragalactic sources used in prior FR studies [e.g., Ingleby et al ., ] and enabled us to measure FR.…”
Section: Observations and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure circular polarization corresponds to an axial ratio of unity for the orthogonal linear electric vectors, meaning no intrinsic linear polarization and therefore no capability to detect FR. However, the MESSENGER transmitter system exhibited a small departure from this ideal state at the nominal operating frequency [ Stilwell et al ., ] corresponding to linear polarization of about 11%, or sometimes more depending on propagation effects. This value is comparable to percentage linear polarization established for extragalactic sources used in prior FR studies [e.g., Ingleby et al ., ] and enabled us to measure FR.…”
Section: Observations and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that point the approach for both the spacecraft and instruments was firm, the planned launch targeted an optimized March 2004 window (Yen, 2001;McAdams et al, 2002), and backup launches in May 2004 and July to August 2004 were identified. The overall spacecraft concept and all subsystems were designed (e.g., Ercol and Santo, 1999;Ercol et al, 2000;Persons et al, 2000;Wallis and Cheng, 2001;Vaughan et al, 2001;Dakermanji et al, 2002;Krupiarz et al, 2002;Nhan et al, 2002;Conde et al, 2002;Ling et al, 2002;Moore, 2002;OÕShaughnessy and Vaughan, 2003;Krupiarz, 2003; Stilwell et al, 2003;Stratton et al, 2003;Hauck and Finnigan, 2003;Heiligman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Design and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%