1998
DOI: 10.1038/nm0398-350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chemokine receptor CCR2 allele delays HIV-1 disease progression and is associated with a CCR5 promoter mutation

Abstract: Viral and host factors influence the rate of HIV-1 disease progression. For HIV-1 to fuse, a CD4+ cell must express a co-receptor that the virus can use. The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 are used by R5 and X4 viruses, respectively. Most new infections involve transmission of R5 viruses, but variants can arise later that also use CXCR4 (R5-X4 or X4 viruses). This is associated with an increased rate of CD4+ T-cell loss and poor prognosis. The ability of host cells to support HIV-1 entry also influences pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
254
3
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(271 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
9
254
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to verify if differences between Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews exist also in other CC-chemokine receptor genes we have analysed in our cohort the frequency of the CCR2-64I mutation (see Table 2), which is associated with slower progression to AIDS in a number of retrospective analyses. [12][13] We have found no significant difference in the frequency of the CCR2-64I allele between the Ashkenazi (9.2%, n = 142) and the Sephardi (13.4%, n = 67, P Ͼ 0.2). Although these results are only for a subset of our cohort, note that the difference in CCR5-⌬32 is already significant in that subset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to verify if differences between Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews exist also in other CC-chemokine receptor genes we have analysed in our cohort the frequency of the CCR2-64I mutation (see Table 2), which is associated with slower progression to AIDS in a number of retrospective analyses. [12][13] We have found no significant difference in the frequency of the CCR2-64I allele between the Ashkenazi (9.2%, n = 142) and the Sephardi (13.4%, n = 67, P Ͼ 0.2). Although these results are only for a subset of our cohort, note that the difference in CCR5-⌬32 is already significant in that subset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…We studied Israeli Jewish blood donors of known ancestry in order to expand on that initial observation and look for differences in the distribution of the CCR5-⌬32 allele and genotypes between Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews. As a control we study the frequency of the CCR2-64I [12][13][14] which was also associated with slower HIV disease progression, as function of the two origin groups. In addition, we discuss a number of possible mechanisms to explain the differences in genetic frequencies between Ashkenazi and Sephardi, considering that both groups originated from the same ancestry about a 1000 years ago.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2) is a receptor for MCP-1, other related chemokines, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infection. A polymorphism in the gene has been described in which the variant 64Val±±>lle is associated with delayed progression to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) [103]. The same polymorphism was found to be less frequent in 100 Japanese patients with sarcoidosis than in 122 controls (OR=0.369) [104].…”
Section: Chemokine/mediator Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CCR2-64I is common and found in 10% of Caucasians, 15% of African-Americans, 25% of Asians and 17% of Hispanics [50]. Epidemiologic studies by Smith et al first demonstrated the association of CCR2-64I with delayed HIV-1 disease progression [50], which was confirmed by most subsequent studies [73,98,99], but not by others [82,100,101]. CCR2-64I is not associated with reduced risk for HIV-1 infection [50].…”
Section: Variation In the Ccr2 Coding Regionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…CCR2-64I is not associated with reduced risk for HIV-1 infection [50]. The mechanism for the association of CCR2-64I with delayed disease progression has not been elucidated despite significant attempts to do so [98,102,103].…”
Section: Variation In the Ccr2 Coding Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%