2001
DOI: 10.2475/ajs.301.4-5.486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Channelization Model of Landscape Evolution

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The geomorphic evolution of many landscapes is fundamentally determined by the evolution of the river channels and their interactions with hillslopes. Consequently, models of landscape evolution ought to track the evolution of the channel geometry so as to quantify the rate of erosion of channel bottoms and to follow the changes in hillslope-channel coupling over time. Unfortunately, the spatial resolution required to describe channel morphology adequately is computationally impractical. It is also b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast mechanical erosion tends to be focused on linear surface watercourses (Stark and Stark, 2001) and may be minimal on interfluves. But these contrasting processes, dissolution and erosion, are not mutually exclusive.…”
Section: Vegetation Cover: Enhancer Versus Inhibitormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast mechanical erosion tends to be focused on linear surface watercourses (Stark and Stark, 2001) and may be minimal on interfluves. But these contrasting processes, dissolution and erosion, are not mutually exclusive.…”
Section: Vegetation Cover: Enhancer Versus Inhibitormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, presented a qualitative conceptual model of landscape evolution in terms of improbable system states, arguing that although deterministic process "laws" act on topography, the actual outcome (i.e., any particular landscape) depends on initial conditions and in particular is sensitive to history. Many other works have similarly generalized complex channel process and response feedbacks to understand morphodynamics (e.g., Fonstad, 2003;Phillips, 2011Phillips, , 2009Phillips, , 1991Chin and Phillips, 2007;Stark and Stark, 2001;Yanites and Tucker, 2010).…”
Section: State Variable Framework For Modeling Morphodynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Channel morphology has long been recognized to influence sediment transport. Of particular relevance to the present work, Stark and Stark (2001) proposed a landscape evolution model with a variable called channelization that is defined as representing "the ease with which sediment can flux through a channel reach". Conceptually, channelization characterizes how changes in reach morphology influence local transport rate.…”
Section: Morphodynamics and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This disaster had a severe socio-cultural impact on Taiwanese aboriginals of the Pingpu group. Reconstruction of the burying course due to the debris avalanche event will not only bring emotional satisfaction to the surviving villagers but will provide a fundamental understanding of the complex mass movement process (Densmore et al, 1997;Densmore and Hovius, 2000;Stark and Stark, 2001;Bachmann et al, 2004;Bruckl and Parotidis, 2005;Bonnet and Crave, 2006). Contrary to the fairly precise rupturing simulation of earthquakes, the complex mass movement of landslides/debris-flows is rarely reconstructed by numerical modeling (e.g.…”
Section: Concluding Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%