1988
DOI: 10.1109/28.2860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ceramic-based ozonizer using high-frequency discharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also used as a plasma-based chemical reactor in many environmental applications, such as ozone production [8][9][10], NOx conversion [11], decomposition of VOCs [12,13], inactivation of microorganisms, and killing bacteria [14][15][16][17]. The reasons for growing the interest in SDBD and making it more efficient than conventional dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), wherein the plasma is generated in the volume between the discharge and the grounded electrodes, could be as follows: (1) the reduction of the applied voltage and the increase in the power efficiency [18]; (2) the availability of the free space over the plasma zone that allows the ozone to accumulate without destructing it by a high temperature of the plasma channels or the collisions with reactive species in the plasma zone, [19]; (3) high energy efficiency to produce reactive species, which exceeds that of volume DBD [9,20]; and (4) operation in ambient air without requiring a noble gas admixture [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also used as a plasma-based chemical reactor in many environmental applications, such as ozone production [8][9][10], NOx conversion [11], decomposition of VOCs [12,13], inactivation of microorganisms, and killing bacteria [14][15][16][17]. The reasons for growing the interest in SDBD and making it more efficient than conventional dielectric barrier discharge (DBD), wherein the plasma is generated in the volume between the discharge and the grounded electrodes, could be as follows: (1) the reduction of the applied voltage and the increase in the power efficiency [18]; (2) the availability of the free space over the plasma zone that allows the ozone to accumulate without destructing it by a high temperature of the plasma channels or the collisions with reactive species in the plasma zone, [19]; (3) high energy efficiency to produce reactive species, which exceeds that of volume DBD [9,20]; and (4) operation in ambient air without requiring a noble gas admixture [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In efficient ozonizers with dry air this NO, concentration is about one percent that of ozone [3]. Though total NO, and ozone formation are reportedly insensitive to humidity, [3] and [4], we observed significant nitric acid and NO, formation, and reduced ozone production, in our ozonizer discharge after steam and fog were introduced. This may be due to the combined electrical and aqueous chemical effects of water droplets in the discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Using a surface discharge in oxygen at 10 kHz, best result reported by Masuda et al in pure oxygen was a yield of 170 g/kWh [29] with a high level of ozone production of 5 to 10 %. Pietsch in O 2 and in air respectively, using dielectric barrier discharges [30].…”
Section: Ieee Electrical Insulation Magazinementioning
confidence: 98%