2010
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-27242010000400011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Causal Decision Making Model for Knowledge Management Capabilities to Innovation Performance in Taiwan's High-Tech Industry

Abstract: R&D and innovation is the source of technology companies' profit. If companies cannot be smoothly implemented technological innovation and R&D investments, then they can not strengthen their competitiveness. In the light of dynamic capabilities and absorptive capacities, we need an effective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) analysis tools to assess the impact of organizational innovation and performance factors so that we can promote organizational innovation performance requires. This study used multiple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al., 2010). By acquiring knowledge from outside the organizations, firms are able to make amendments to the operating principle effectively (Chang and Tzeng, 2010). Disseminating knowledge leads to learning and knowledge modification, which consequently increases innovation (Chen and Huang, 2009;Hung, et.…”
Section: Tqm-km-innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2010). By acquiring knowledge from outside the organizations, firms are able to make amendments to the operating principle effectively (Chang and Tzeng, 2010). Disseminating knowledge leads to learning and knowledge modification, which consequently increases innovation (Chen and Huang, 2009;Hung, et.…”
Section: Tqm-km-innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of absorptive capacity has assumed importance over time due to the system dynamic capacity in the process of business innovation (Cohen and Levinthal, 1994;Zahra and George, 2002;Lane, Koka and Pathak, 2006;Camisón and Forés, 2010;Chang and Tzeng, 2010;Sun and Anderson, 2010;Patterson and Ambrosini, 2015).…”
Section: Absorptive Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible solution would be the adoption of multi-criteria methods which take into account a range of quantitative and qualitative factors when assessing projects (Zopounidis & Doumpos, 2002). In fact, Vandaele & Decouttere (2013) concluded for the real need of a R&D assessment decision support tool integrating several dimensions of analysis and to accomplish that need it is necessary to resource to multi-criteria tools to assess the impact of R&D projects on the company including several performance factors (Chang & Tzeng, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%