2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/8406379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Case Study of Anomalous Snowfall with an Alberta Clipper

Abstract: An Alberta clipper moved over western New York state on 11-12 January 2004, producing snowfall amounts of up to 27 cm in portions of the region during a roughly 12-h period. In addition, lightning and thunder were reported. Such systems, known primarily for their fast motion and relatively dry nature, are not generally associated with significant snowfalls. A postmortem analysis of this event, following an ingredients-based methodology, revealed that as the weak low approached the lower Great Lakes, it came un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since these storms form at northern latitudes inland from major moisture sources, they are often associated with anomalously cold, yet dry conditions (Hutchinson, 1995;Thomas and Martin, 2007). Snowfall directly generated from the central is often light to moderate in magnitude with a high snow-to-liquid ratio (Rochette et al, 2017). Non-cyclonic storms are associated with an upper-level disturbance, cold air advection, or quasistationary fronts, but no central low pressure near the study area.…”
Section: Snowfall Contributions From Non-lake-effect Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these storms form at northern latitudes inland from major moisture sources, they are often associated with anomalously cold, yet dry conditions (Hutchinson, 1995;Thomas and Martin, 2007). Snowfall directly generated from the central is often light to moderate in magnitude with a high snow-to-liquid ratio (Rochette et al, 2017). Non-cyclonic storms are associated with an upper-level disturbance, cold air advection, or quasistationary fronts, but no central low pressure near the study area.…”
Section: Snowfall Contributions From Non-lake-effect Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%