2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13748-018-0153-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case study at the Nissan Barcelona factory to minimize the ergonomic risk and its standard deviation in a mixed-model assembly line

Abstract: This work examines a balancing problem wherein the objective is to minimize both the ergonomic risk dispersion between the set of workstations of a mixed-model assembly line and the risk level of the workstation with the greatest ergonomic factor. A greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) procedure is proposed to achieve these two objectives simultaneously. This new procedure is compared against two mixed integer linear programs: the MILP-1 model that minimizes the maximum ergonomic risk of the ass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combined/general assessment method is applied in [102][103][104][105][106][107]. Within a singleobjective function, Refs.…”
Section: Assembly Line Balancing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A combined/general assessment method is applied in [102][103][104][105][106][107]. Within a singleobjective function, Refs.…”
Section: Assembly Line Balancing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the number of stations and cycle time, different specifications of the objective function are introduced to minimize the maximum risk, the absolute risk deviations between stations, and the difference between the maximum and minimum risk. Within a multi-objective function, the ergonomic risk is minimized in [102,105] regarding the movements of the upper limbs (assessed according to OCRA), awkward body postures (assessed according to RULA), and lifting/lowering activities (assessed according to the NIOSH-Eq). Next to maximum risk value, Ref.…”
Section: Assembly Line Balancing Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[47,63] develop an integrated assembly line balancing problem considering the energy expenditure of assembly and components picking, while [12] propose to evaluate the same aspects by using REBA method. On the other side, [64,65] consider ergonomics for both assembly line design and balancing, focusing on single-and mixed-model assembly lines. As it can be seen from the literature review here presented, there are few approaches that consider the impact of materials' exposure and components picking on assembly times and operators' ergonomics.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrasquillo et al (2017) conducted a simulation analysis to investigate the effect of conveyor type and product sequence on the ergonomic risks to workers' upper body and lower back exertions and total recovery time. Bautista-Valhondo and Alfaro-Pozo (2018) proposed a greedy randomised adaptive search procedure to jointly minimise the ergonomic risk dispersion and the maximum ergonomic risk level. They compared results obtained using the developed procedure with two mixed-integer linear models by applying them to a real industrial application, an automotive engine assembly line.…”
Section: Mixed-model Assembly Linementioning
confidence: 99%