2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10384-009-0774-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of late-onset diffuse lamellar keratitis 12 years after laser in situ keratomileusis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present case study is the second case study to report late-onset DLK from LASIK surgery, appearing 10 years after LASIK treatment. The findings of the present case study and the previous study (8) indicate that DLK is able to manifest after an extended period of time following LASIK surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present case study is the second case study to report late-onset DLK from LASIK surgery, appearing 10 years after LASIK treatment. The findings of the present case study and the previous study (8) indicate that DLK is able to manifest after an extended period of time following LASIK surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…DLK is characterized by diffused white, granular infiltrate around the edge of the corneal flap (7) and typically occurs within a few days after LASIK surgery. However, a previous report described a case where DLK occurred 12 years after LASIK surgery (8), although this is considered to be extremely rare. The present case study is the second case study to report late-onset DLK from LASIK surgery, appearing 10 years after LASIK treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although numerous etiologies contribute to the occurrence of DLK in the early postoperative period, cases have also been reported in the late postoperative period. 19,20 Case 4 was a late-onset DLK, occurring 5 months after the femtosecond lenticule extraction procedure. Although the inciting agent was unclear, we assumed that the patient's older age, with more meibomian gland secretions, or an allergic reaction might be the contributor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%