2020
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case of allergic contact dermatitis to dental bonding materials, masked by the use of gloves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patch tests were positive to HEMA and the dental bonding agent 1% pet. The product proved to contain HEMA and dimethacrylate monomer 109 …”
Section: Case Reports Of Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused By Hemamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patch tests were positive to HEMA and the dental bonding agent 1% pet. The product proved to contain HEMA and dimethacrylate monomer 109 …”
Section: Case Reports Of Allergic Contact Dermatitis Caused By Hemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The product proved to contain HEMA and dimethacrylate monomer. 109 A 58-year-old non-atopic dental nurse had been occupationally exposed to dental acrylics for 19 years when she developed dermatitis and moderately severe paresthesia of fingertips I-III of both hands.…”
Section: Dental Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%