2021
DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2019-0703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A case for adding an inspection level related to structural health monitoring (SHM) for bridge evaluation

Abstract: The Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CHBDC) uses the concept of a target reliability index for evaluating the load carrying capacity of existing bridges. This index, which is based on risk to human life, relates to three aspects of uncertainties inherent in a bridge; (a) element behaviour, (b) system behavior, and (c) inspection level, where the inspection level currently refers to only manual inspections. Citing examples of tests on many instrumented bridges, the paper proposes an additional inspection le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method will generate a large amount of monitoring data, and the cost is high, so it is only suitable for large-span bridge projects that have large investments and play a vital role [11]. In the current engineering practice, the inspection of small and medium-sized span bridges mainly relies on manual inspection, and the inspection cycle is generally 6-10 years, but manual inspection makes it difficult to accurately and timely monitor the status of bridges [12,13]. Therefore, an indirect measurement method suitable for the detection of medium and small-span bridges has been widely used at home and abroad.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method will generate a large amount of monitoring data, and the cost is high, so it is only suitable for large-span bridge projects that have large investments and play a vital role [11]. In the current engineering practice, the inspection of small and medium-sized span bridges mainly relies on manual inspection, and the inspection cycle is generally 6-10 years, but manual inspection makes it difficult to accurately and timely monitor the status of bridges [12,13]. Therefore, an indirect measurement method suitable for the detection of medium and small-span bridges has been widely used at home and abroad.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) e first measure is a system of human monitoring, giving information that is often more qualitative than quantitative, and that can be somewhat subjective. e techniques of this measure include inspection and monitoring by manual methods, visual inspection, and use of specialized equipment [9][10][11]. is measure has significant advantages and is simple and easy to implement, and the inspection cost for initial investment is low, but it has disadvantages as well: the damages in the details of the bridge structure cannot be detected in a timely fashion, and the bridge material mechanical changes cannot be evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%