A Case Analysis on the Focus on the Maturity Models and Information Technologies

Gökşen, Yılmaz; Çevik, Eda; Avunduk, Hüseyin

doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00022-2

Cited by 23 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The overall assessment of the maturity of the technology aspect revealed that 55.6% of the respondents demonstrated a low level of maturity 21 (levels 1 and 2), while two respondents demonstrated a medium level of maturity (level 3). Another two respondents demonstrated a high level of maturity (level 4) with regard to the aspect of technology.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of generalised audit software by internal audit functions in a developing country: A maturity level assessment

Nest¹,

Smidt²,

Lubbe³

2017

RGC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article explores the existing practices of internal audit functions in the locally controlled South African banking industry regarding the use of Generalised Audit Software (GAS), against a benchmark developed from recognised data analytic maturity models, in order to assess the current maturity levels of the locally controlled South African banks in the use of this software for tests of controls. The literature review indicates that the use of GAS by internal audit functions is still at a relatively low level of maturity, despite the accelerating adoption of information technology and generation of big data within organisations. The empirical results of this article also confirm that the maturity of the use of GAS by the internal auditors employed by locally controlled South African banks is still lower than expected, given that the world, especially from a business perspective is now fully immersed in a technological-driven business environment. This study has since been extended to other industries in the following countries namely, Canada, Columbia, Portugal and Australia.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of generalised audit software by internal audit functions in a developing country: A maturity level assessment

Nest¹,

Smidt²,

Lubbe³

2017

RGC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…the model is later being adapted into many fields of studies to identify or measure the maturity level of an organization or process or even product quality as they are widely known. The capability maturity model (CMM) which was for software industries has some key elements for an effective software development process [10] the model has 5 basic process maturity levels called, initial, repeatable, defined, managed, and optimizing [11]. A best-practices and process efficiency is provided for every five levels of each process for evaluating the maturity [12].…”

Section: Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Explanatory Review on Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Models

Garba¹,

Siraj²,

Othman³

2020

Adv. sci. technol. eng. syst. j.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cybersecurity is growing exponentially day by day in both the public and private sectors. This growth also comes with a new and dynamic cyber-threats risk that causes both sectors' performance to halt. These sectors must update their cybersecurity measures and must understand the capability and maturity of their organization's cybersecurity preparedness. Cybersecurity maturity models are widely used to measure how ready an organization is when it comes to cybersecurity. The main aim of this article is to conduct a comprehensive review of the current cybersecurity capability maturity models using a systematic review of published articles from 2011 to 2019. A comparative study was conducted based on Halvorsen and Conradi's taxonomy. The review indicated almost all the cybersecurity maturity model consists of similar elements like maturity levels and processes but significantly lacks the validation process, it was observed each of the models were predominantly designed for a specific purpose and also for different organization size and application domain.

show abstract

“…it becomes popular in the 1990s when it was first developed by software engineering institutions [6]. The model is later being adapted into many fields of studies to identify or measure the maturity level of an organization or process or even product quality as the widely known model called capability maturity model (CMM) which was for software industries which describes the key elements of an effective software development process [7]. Today all these models are basic on this basic model, the model has a set of a structured set of operations and activities that improve over time [8].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cybersecurity capability maturity models review and application domain

Garba¹,

Bade²,

Yahuza³

et al. 2020

IJET

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cybersecurity is a way of protecting organization critical assets, through the identification of cyber threats that can compromise the information stored, it involves the protection, identification, and responding to threats. The main aim of this article is to conduct an ample review of the published cybersecurity capability maturity models using a systematic review of published articles from 2014 to 2019. Features of Hal- vorsen and Conradi’s taxonomy were adopted to explain the models identified. The results indicated adopting a model to a certain organization is not feasible. However, modification is required before implementation, as the cost of implementation is not available when conducting this research.

show abstract

A Case Analysis on the Focus on the Maturity Models and Information Technologies

Cited by 23 publications

References 3 publications

The use of generalised audit software by internal audit functions in a developing country: A maturity level assessment

The use of generalised audit software by internal audit functions in a developing country: A maturity level assessment

An Explanatory Review on Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Models

Cybersecurity capability maturity models review and application domain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About