2013
DOI: 10.1109/tcsii.2013.2258250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Capacitorless LDO Regulator With Fast Feedback Technique and Low-Quiescent Current Error Amplifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transient response of LDO regulators is dominated by both the slew rate of the gate power transistor, SR G , and the loop gain bandwidth, BW L [9]. To achieve a high slew rate, a large current must be supplied to the gate of a PMOS.…”
Section: Proposed Design and Circuit Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transient response of LDO regulators is dominated by both the slew rate of the gate power transistor, SR G , and the loop gain bandwidth, BW L [9]. To achieve a high slew rate, a large current must be supplied to the gate of a PMOS.…”
Section: Proposed Design and Circuit Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In published literature, different regulator architectures, which have advantages in specific applications, have been proposed [2][3][4][5][6]. The adequacy of a regulator structure is determined by the requirements of the technical specifications for the power supply.…”
Section: Proposed Ldo Regulator Structure and Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compensation is realized by active feedback compensation (AFC) and adaptively-biased dampingfactor-control compensation (DFC), and the transient enhancer block is also embedded in the proposed LDR structure. [6], [13] which can provide static bias current that is dynamically-adjustable in response to load transient.…”
Section: Proposed Ldo Regulator Architecture and Transient Enhancmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent researches have produced various output capacitorless LDR structures [6]- [9] that all require various polesplitting compensation methods for stability. Conventional passive Miller compensations have the disadvantage of reduced unity-gain-frequency (UGF); active feedback (AFC) and damping-factor-control (DFC) are among the most effective that overcome this side-effect, with extended UGF and reduced Q factor [7], [10]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%