A call to alarms: Current state and future directions in the battle against alarm fatigue

Abstract

Research demonstrates that the majority of alarms derived from continuous bedside monitoring devices are non-actionable. This avalanche of unreliable alerts causes clinicians to experience sensory overload when attempting to sort real from false alarms, causing desensitization and alarm fatigue, which in turn leads to adverse events when true instability is neither recognized nor attended to despite the alarm. The scope of the problem of alarm fatigue is broad, and its contributing mechanisms are numerous. Current and future approaches to defining and reacting to actionable and non-actionable alarms are being developed and investigated, but challenges in impacting alarm modalities, sensitivity and specificity, and clinical activity in order to reduce alarm fatigue and adverse events remain. A multi-faceted approach involving clinicians, computer scientists, industry, and regulatory agencies is needed to battle alarm fatigue.

Can continuous remote vital sign monitoring reduce the number of room visits to patients suspected of COVID-19: A quasi-experimental study

“…In addition, the number of outcomes could be extended. Except for alarm fatigue ( Hravnak et al, 2018 ) few aspects of the way workflow is influenced by continuous monitoring have been studied so far. A more advanced approach that may optimize the effects of continuous vital sign monitoring for patients in isolation is integrating this technology with an audio-video system, to enable nurses to acquire situational awareness.…”

Technical Aspects of Intensive Care Unit Management: A Single-Center Experience at a Tertiary Academic Hospital

“… 8 A multi-faceted involvement of clinicians, industry, computer scientists, and regulatory agencies was advocated to prevent alarm fatigue among HCWs. 9 …”

Adaptive threshold-based alarm strategies for continuous vital signs monitoring

“…Various alternative methods that may improve alarm precision or reduce the number of false alarms in continuous vital signs monitoring have been described, with a clear trend towards intelligent techniques [18][19][20]. However, the integration of these advanced methods in patient care brings various concerns regarding the accuracy, reliability, efficiency, and interoperability [21][22][23].…”