1997
DOI: 10.1016/0890-6955(95)00039-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CAD approach to helical groove machining. Part 2: Numerical evaluation and sensitivity analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) is first truncated within the cross section to obtain the flute profile by setting Z element as a constant shown in Eq. (6).…”
Section: Five-axis Flute-grinding Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(4) is first truncated within the cross section to obtain the flute profile by setting Z element as a constant shown in Eq. (6).…”
Section: Five-axis Flute-grinding Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ehmann et al [4] calculated the contact line between the grinding wheel and tool bar using conjugate theory, that is, the common normal at the contact point between the wheel surface and flute surface should intersect with the central axis of the tool bar. Based on the conjugate theory, the general analytical representation of the generated flute profile and determination of wheel profile were discussed by the following researchers [5][6][7][8][9]. However, the methods introduced above with conjugate theory can only be available while the wheel surface is C 1 continual.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working surface of the cutter is composed of a toroid-shaped revolving surface, a revolving involute surface, and a cylindrical surface [2]. There are helical grooves [3] on the toroid-shaped revolving surface and the revolving involute surface, which provide the tool with its cutting function. Evaluating the contour quality of this kind of cutter should take the axis of the minimum circumscribed cylinder of the shank as the datum axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists several methods to compute interference errors (direct problem) and determine adapted tool profile (inverse problem) having a different complexity, approximation levels. Studies are also focused on the numerical aspect for computing solution and the sensitivity of algorithm to solve tool profile determination [11][12].…”
Section: Surfaces Machined With Form Tools and Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worms, threads, flutes and grooves are mostly defined by helicoids which are mostly machined with a disk type tool [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and sometimes with an axial type one [10]. There exists several methods to compute interference errors (direct problem) and determine adapted tool profile (inverse problem) having a different complexity, approximation levels.…”
Section: Surfaces Machined With Form Tools and Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%