A Buddhist economic approach to the development of community enterprises: a case study from Southern Thailand

Abstract

This study was undertaken to observe the development process and key success factors in three community enterprises adopting a Buddhist economic approach to development. The enterprises were established by weavers, farmers and housewives from three communities in the south of Thailand. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews and observation with representatives of the groups and their supporters as they participated in community activities. Buddhist economics differs significantly from neoclassical economics in its recognition of ethic and moral issues. In addition to the objective of production or consumption to optimise profit or utility value, Buddhist economics also recognises that many non-financial factors which contribute to an individual's quality of life are important. The key success factor in the community enterprises which were studied was the process of 'good thinking', or the constructive use of wisdom among leaders and group members through the processes of 'right understanding' and 'right thought'. Economically efficient activities were developed through the use of an external factora 'good friend', comparable with social capital-and an internal factor-the employment of analytical thinking by members, comparable to the use of human capital. Neither factor can be created from physical capital but is derived from the process of learning and reviewing.

The Guidelines for Management of Community Enterprises: A Case Study of Don Chang Sub-district, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand

“…In addition, Bradley, Meyer, and Gao (2006) suggested that local entrepreneurs export to international markets by collaborating with large entrepreneurs to seek new target markets in foreign countries. Prayukvong (2005) suggested the key success factor in community enterprises is good decision-making by members of community enterprises and how to use the local wisdom of leaders and group members in their thinking process.…”

Sufficiency Community Economic Development System: A Pathway to Sustainable Community Development in Thailand

“…Welfare for an individual in this case has been translated in economics as "utility" which can be gained by having more material possessions. Wellbeing, for this approach, is an indirect effect from economic development (Prayukvong, 2005) while, SEA place humanity by focusing on the wellbeing as the centre of development. Wellbeing in this sense comprises of three dimensions: material, relational, and subjective (White, 2008).…”

The Potential of Floating Markets for Creative Tourism: A Study in Nakhon Pathom Province, Thailand

“…However, in the case of KKW, the dominant power is exerted by the temple, which is seen as a highly respectable institute in the community. The intention of the abbot to solicit only a onetime fee for the rent was based on his good intention toward local vendors, which in turn reinforces the role of the temple as a supporter of the community (Prayukvong, 2005). However, this practice impeded the management of the floating market and decreased the level of participation and involvement from the locals.…”