2019
DOI: 10.3390/mi10030168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bubble-Free Microfluidic Device for Easy-to-Operate Immobilization, Culturing and Monitoring of Zebrafish Embryos

Abstract: The development of miniaturized devices for studying zebrafish embryos has been limited due to complicated fabrication and operation processes. Here, we reported on a microfluidic device that enabled the capture and culture of zebrafish embryos and real-time monitoring of dynamic embryonic development. The device was simply fabricated by bonding two layers of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) structures replicated from three-dimensional (3D) printed reusable molds onto a flat glass substrate. Embryos were easily loa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, PDMS is a commonly used material for microfluidic device fabrication [ 27 ] and is also known for its high gas permeability [ 28 , 29 ]. Therefore, a variety of active degassing methods using PDMS membranes have been developed for a wide range of microfluidic applications, such as PCR [ 30 ], cell culture [ 31 ], drug screening [ 32 ], and fuel cells [ 33 ]. Most PDMS-based active degassing methods use vacuum microchambers for bubble extraction [ 34 , 35 ], which is usually implemented in a multi-layered structure, making device fabrication difficult and impractical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, PDMS is a commonly used material for microfluidic device fabrication [ 27 ] and is also known for its high gas permeability [ 28 , 29 ]. Therefore, a variety of active degassing methods using PDMS membranes have been developed for a wide range of microfluidic applications, such as PCR [ 30 ], cell culture [ 31 ], drug screening [ 32 ], and fuel cells [ 33 ]. Most PDMS-based active degassing methods use vacuum microchambers for bubble extraction [ 34 , 35 ], which is usually implemented in a multi-layered structure, making device fabrication difficult and impractical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Thus, the fabrication of molds with multilevel microstructures for the PDMS microdevice fabrication presents a useful potential for biological applications. 18,20,28,29 Recently, we reported the manufacture of PDMS microuidic devices by employing a exographic photopolymer as mold. 30,31 Advantages related to resolution, mold size, aspect ratio, roughness, availability, scalability and costs were demonstrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has millimeter-scale bent and flat tapered flow channels that prevent air bubbles from entering the observation area without the need for additional bubble-removing devices. Various bubble trap systems based on microfluidic technologies have been proposed previously [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. For instance, researchers have developed a two-layer bubble barrier structure, in which the top layer blocks bubbles and the bottom layer works as a fluidic channel [ 11 ], and a debubbler using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) pneumatic layer [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%