A brief, standardized tool for measuring HIV‐related stigma among health facility staff: results of field testing in China, Dominica, Egypt, Kenya, Puerto Rico and St. Christopher & Nevis

Abstract

IntroductionWithin healthcare settings, HIV-related stigma is a recognized barrier to access of HIV prevention and treatment services and yet, few efforts have been made to scale-up stigma reduction programs in service delivery. This is in part due to the lack of a brief, simple, standardized tool for measuring stigma among all levels of health facility staff that works across diverse HIV prevalence, language and healthcare settings. In response, an international consortium led by the Health Policy Project, has developed and field tested a stigma measurement tool for use with health facility staff.MethodsExperts participated in a content-development workshop to review an item pool of existing measures, identify gaps and prioritize questions. The resulting questionnaire was field tested in six diverse sites (China, Dominica, Egypt, Kenya, Puerto Rico and St. Christopher & Nevis). Respondents included clinical and non-clinical staff. Questionnaires were self- or interviewer-administered. Analysis of item performance across sites examined both psychometric properties and contextual issues.ResultsThe key outcome of the process was a substantially reduced questionnaire. Eighteen core questions measure three programmatically actionable drivers of stigma within health facilities (worry about HIV transmission, attitudes towards people living with HIV (PLHIV), and health facility environment, including policies), and enacted stigma. The questionnaire also includes one short scale for attitudes towards PLHIV (5-item scale, α = 0.78).ConclusionsStigma-reduction programmes in healthcare facilities are urgently needed to improve the quality of care provided, uphold the human right to healthcare, increase access to health services, and maximize investments in HIV prevention and treatment. This brief, standardized tool will facilitate inclusion of stigma measurement in research studies and in routine facility data collection, allowing for the monitoring of stigma within healthcare facilities and evaluation of stigma-reduction programmes. There is potential for wide use of the tool either as a stand-alone survey or integrated within other studies of health facility staff.

“She Told Them, Oh That Bitch Got AIDS”: Experiences of Multilevel HIV/AIDS-Related Stigma Among African American Women Living with HIV/AIDS in the South

“…14,45 Although an upstream focus to alleviate stigma is critical, programs focused on individual-level solutions, such as patient navigation, can reduce barriers that prohibit HIVpositive individuals from engaging in HIV care. 46,47 Furthermore, recently validated scales to measure healthcare provider HIV stigma may allow healthcare facilities to better identify the specific nature of stigma and develop improved trainings and interventions to change providers' behaviors and beliefs 48,49 toward PLWHA. Due to their marginalized racial and socioeconomic status, we contend that in many instances, HIV-positive African American women in this sample felt powerless to counter such stigma.…”

Shame, Guilt, and Stress: Community Perceptions of Barriers to Engaging in Prevention of Mother to Child Transmission (PMTCT) Programs in Western Kenya

“…19,20 Turan et al developed a model where psychosocial effects of stigma and discrimination (shame, guilt, and denial) lead to behavioral consequences (lack of disclosure, avoidance of ANC, or lack of adherence), and ultimately result in negative health outcomes for mother and child. 21 We found that stigma measures, both externalized and internalized, were prevalent in this community-based survey.…”

Intimate partner violence and forced migration during pregnancy: Structural constraints to women's agency

“…Nyanza also has Kenya’s highest HIV prevalence rate, (15% of persons aged 15–49) (NASCOP, July 2008). In this context of high HIV prevalence, stigma and discrimination related to HIV are common (Akullian et al, 2014; Nyblade et al, 2013). …”