“…e reason why the rate was chosen at 6% was that the systematic error was 6% obtained by the calibration curve for screening the NAIs. In total, the inhibitory ratios of 28 fractions which were truly active fractions among the 75 fractions (fractions 3,4,5,6,8,15,18,19,20,21,22,23,25,29,30,31,32,38,39,40,46,47,66,67,68,69, 70, and 71) increased with an increasing concentration, which exhibited obvious relativity between the dose and the effect as shown in Figure 5. ese fractions have been indicated as the potential NAIs.…”