2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A biogenic volatile organic compound emission inventory for Hong Kong

Abstract: a b s t r a c tBiogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) in the atmosphere react to form ozone and secondary organic aerosols, which deteriorate air quality, affect human health, and indirectly influence global climate changes. The present study aims to provide a preliminary assessment of BVOC emissions in Hong Kong (HKSAR). Thriteen local tree species were measured for their isoprene emission potential. Tree distribution was estimated for country park areas based on field survey data. Plant emission data ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
44
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(26 reference statements)
8
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the dominant tree species in Guangdong also changed from coniferous forest (mainly strong terpene emitters) into broadleaf forest (predominantly isoprene emitters), which is consistent with that reported by Ye (2010). In the last decade, the total changes in forest cover between the base year (2006) Table 3, the results of this study fall within the ranges of previously published inventories in PRD (Zheng et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2011) and Hong Kong (Tsui et al, 2009). For example, in the present study the average isoprene emission flux in PRD was 0.35 Mg C km (2 in July, slightly higher than the summertime average of 0.31 Mg C km (2 reported by Wang et al (2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the dominant tree species in Guangdong also changed from coniferous forest (mainly strong terpene emitters) into broadleaf forest (predominantly isoprene emitters), which is consistent with that reported by Ye (2010). In the last decade, the total changes in forest cover between the base year (2006) Table 3, the results of this study fall within the ranges of previously published inventories in PRD (Zheng et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2011) and Hong Kong (Tsui et al, 2009). For example, in the present study the average isoprene emission flux in PRD was 0.35 Mg C km (2 in July, slightly higher than the summertime average of 0.31 Mg C km (2 reported by Wang et al (2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In this study, PFT-specific emission factors of BVOCs for the four aggregated PFTs (i.e., broadleaf forest, coniferous forest, shrub, and cropland/grassland) were determined by local field observations in the literature Sakulyanontvittaya et al, 2008;Tsui et al, 2009;Leung et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2011). NO emission factors from soil were developed through measurements with static or dynamic chambers (Williams et al, 1992;Guenther et al, 2000).…”
Section: Megan Natural Emission Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher RIR of BVOCs in summer was mainly due to the higher biogenic emissions in summer. In addition, higher photochemical reactivity of BVOCs also contributed to higher RIR of BVOCs (Atkinson and Arey, 2003;Tsui et al, 2009). The RIR values of NO x , in contrast, were negative in all seasons, indicating that reducing NO x would lead to an increase in photochemical O 3 formation.…”
Section: Ozone-precursor Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Local studies (Bai and Wang, 2001;Klinger et al, 2002;Tsui et al, 2009) have quantified the standard emission factors of isoprene, leaf-or branch-level, for some plant species, including the dominated tree species around the studying site (Table 1). Most of them were measured in DBR.…”
Section: Isoprene Emission Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainties in model parameters, including activity factor, meteorological inputs and vegetation input, were firstly quantified with statistical analysis For emission factor of explicit tree species, the uncertainty ranges were citied from literature (Bai and Wang, 2001;Klinger et al, 2002;Tsui et al, 2009). The probabilistic distributions used to obtain the uncertainties are summarized in Table 2, where the distributions are in accordance with the previous studies (Hanna et al, 1998;Tang et al, 2010;Zheng et al, 2010b).…”
Section: Monte Carlo Approach For Quantifying the Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%