2003
DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2003.9655858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bioethics course for biology and science education students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They could hardly be solved by applying conventional moral philosophy and ethical arguments. Faced with moral dilemmas, some have retreated to using 'natural' and 'unnatural' as meaning acceptable or unacceptable (7). However, in the early 21 st century, much of what is accepted as natural in developed societies is definitely not natural.…”
Section: Subfields Of Bioethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They could hardly be solved by applying conventional moral philosophy and ethical arguments. Faced with moral dilemmas, some have retreated to using 'natural' and 'unnatural' as meaning acceptable or unacceptable (7). However, in the early 21 st century, much of what is accepted as natural in developed societies is definitely not natural.…”
Section: Subfields Of Bioethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This applies to almost all medical interventions, many aspects of agriculture and to human interactions with the biosphere. The weakness of the dilemma 'natural versus unnatural' as a basis for ethical decision making, at least in the public domain, has been criticized by a number of scholars (7,8,24). Some of them have acknowledged that personal revulsion and in particularly reconsidering of underlying human values may be an important factor in determining an individual's response to biological advancements (7).…”
Section: Subfields Of Bioethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations