2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bio-friendly and economical technique for chronic implantation of multiple microelectrode arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to move individual electrodes can dramatically improve the yield of single units, as demonstrated by the comparison of the unit activity between electrodes that had or had not been moved across pairs of successive sessions. The single-unit yields in the initial recording sessions of each implant were similar to those reported for experiments using immovable electrode arrays, chronically implanted in multiple cortical areas (Chhatbar et al 2010;Nicolelis et al 2003). However, the ability to move electrodes at will over the lifetime of the implant led to sustained yields over the long term, in marked contrast to the time-dependent deterioration of yields typically seen with immovable electrode arrays Muthuswamy et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The ability to move individual electrodes can dramatically improve the yield of single units, as demonstrated by the comparison of the unit activity between electrodes that had or had not been moved across pairs of successive sessions. The single-unit yields in the initial recording sessions of each implant were similar to those reported for experiments using immovable electrode arrays, chronically implanted in multiple cortical areas (Chhatbar et al 2010;Nicolelis et al 2003). However, the ability to move electrodes at will over the lifetime of the implant led to sustained yields over the long term, in marked contrast to the time-dependent deterioration of yields typically seen with immovable electrode arrays Muthuswamy et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…S1 cortex was implanted with an array of electrodes (96 channel Utah array, Blackrock Microsystems) [8]. Peristimulus time histograms (PSTH) of neural spiking data were generated for two time intervals by aligning spike times either with the timing of a visual cue relaying the impending result of a given trial (reward will be delivered or reward will be withheld) or with the timing of the trial’s outcome (reward delivered or reward withheld) and extended 500 milliseconds after the stimulus of interest using a 100 millisecond bin width.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following successful training the animal was implanted in primary somatosensory (S1) cortex with a microelectrode array (96-channel Utah array, 1.0mm length, Blackrock Microsystems) [5,6]. Following a healing period of two weeks, neural activity was recorded using a multi-acquisition processor system (MAP, Plexon Inc., Dallas, TX) controlled by a Windows PC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%