1965
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1965.tb14595.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bio-Engineering Study of the Mechanical Properties of Human Skin in Relation to Its Structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the value of the constant b was the same for each group, while that of k was altered as predicted from the change in the value of n produced by varying the sectional area. Further verification of this was obtained in experiments along and across Longer's lines (Ridge and Wright, 1966b). It was found that the same value of b was obtained for specimens taken along and across Langer's lines.…”
Section: Rheological Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was found that the value of the constant b was the same for each group, while that of k was altered as predicted from the change in the value of n produced by varying the sectional area. Further verification of this was obtained in experiments along and across Longer's lines (Ridge and Wright, 1966b). It was found that the same value of b was obtained for specimens taken along and across Langer's lines.…”
Section: Rheological Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A dumbell shaped specimen was stamped out with a die. Its dimensions have been described elsewhere (Ridge and Wright, 1966a).…”
Section: Fig I Skin Extensometermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenological models apply mathematical formulas, such as using a mathematical formation [63][64][65][66] or a strain energy density function [59,67], to imitate the response of skin to various types of mechanical loading based on the data from mechanical experiments, without detailed internal structural consideration.…”
Section: Phenomenological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting gender differences in skin, Martin et al (1992) found the patterning of skin thickness to be similar in males and females, but female skin thickness to be less at all sites measured. Further, the histologic findings of Lindholm (1931) suggest elastic fibres are more numerous in female than male skin, with female skin being more extensible and under less tension than that of a male (Ridge and Wright 1965). Further, the histologic findings of Lindholm (1931) suggest elastic fibres are more numerous in female than male skin, with female skin being more extensible and under less tension than that of a male (Ridge and Wright 1965).…”
Section: Gender Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%