2022
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202201679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bilayer Membrane Doped with Struvite Nanowires for Guided Bone Regeneration

Abstract: Guided bone regeneration (GBR) therapy demonstrates a prominent curative effect on the management of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bone defects. In this study, a GBR membrane consisting of a microporous layer and a struvite‐nanowire‐doped fibrous layer is constructed via non‐solvent induced phase separation, followed by an electrospinning procedure to treat critical‐sized calvarial defects. The microporous layer shows selective permeability for excluding the rapid‐growing non‐osteogenic tissues and potential wound… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30] Considering that alveolar bone loss can often occur in the context of periodontitis or tooth-replacement procedure, many studies have devoted to regenerating the defective bony tissues (Table 1). [15,[31][32][33][34][35] To endow the membrane with additional osteo-promotive properties, therapeutic additives would further be incorporated, like bioceramics (e.g., magnesium-containing bioceramics, hydroxyapatite and calcium phosphate) or growth factors (e.g., bone morphogenic proteins). Recently, our group has reported an asymmetric periosteum-mimicking guided bone regeneration (GBR) membrane through a two-step electrospinning procedure, whereby the blend of polycaprolactone (PCL) and gelatin A (GelA) was the membrane matrix and the magnesium oxychloride ceramic (MOC) nanoneedle was the deliverable osteoinductive factor.…”
Section: Biphasic/bilayer Gtr Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[30] Considering that alveolar bone loss can often occur in the context of periodontitis or tooth-replacement procedure, many studies have devoted to regenerating the defective bony tissues (Table 1). [15,[31][32][33][34][35] To endow the membrane with additional osteo-promotive properties, therapeutic additives would further be incorporated, like bioceramics (e.g., magnesium-containing bioceramics, hydroxyapatite and calcium phosphate) or growth factors (e.g., bone morphogenic proteins). Recently, our group has reported an asymmetric periosteum-mimicking guided bone regeneration (GBR) membrane through a two-step electrospinning procedure, whereby the blend of polycaprolactone (PCL) and gelatin A (GelA) was the membrane matrix and the magnesium oxychloride ceramic (MOC) nanoneedle was the deliverable osteoinductive factor.…”
Section: Biphasic/bilayer Gtr Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, a dual-phase GBR membrane consisting of a selectivepermeable microporous layer and an osteoconductive struvitenanowire-laden fibrous layer was constructed using our previously developed non-solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) technique followed by electrospinning, [36][37][38] which showed superior healing performance in the repair of the critical-sized rat calvarial defects (Figure 2C). [34] 3D printing has been popular in tissue engineering field, for the feasibility to construct 3D porous scaffolds with pre-tailorized and personalized architectures. [39,40] Hence, the combination of 3D printing with the electrospinning technique turns out to be a promising strategy to establish a bilayer scaffold for GTR/GBR applications.…”
Section: Biphasic/bilayer Gtr Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, bone defect repair requires protection against adverse external tissue effects and an internal microenvironment to regulate osteogenesis. [31] Electrospinning bilayer membranes with an asymmetric structure are expected to construct a biomimetic periosteum to repair bone defects. The main advantage of asymmetric structures is that each surface's morphological structure, composition, and bioactivity are individually adjusted to optimize the overall performance of the membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%