2019
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1695168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A bi-objective robust resource allocation model for the RCPSP considering resource transfer costs

Abstract: Resource allocation is one of the core issues in project scheduling to ensure the effective use of scare renewable resource, and has been regularly encountered in production systems in the manufacturing and service industries. The transfers of renewable resources between activities generally incur certain scheduling costs and affect the robustness of a certain schedule in an uncertain environment. To address this issue, a bi-objective optimization model is proposed to make the resource transfer decisions, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the realized activity durations are assumed to follow a right‐skewed lognormal distribution with the mean equal to the deterministic duration and a standard deviation σ representing the duration variability level. The lognormal distribution has also been adopted by some other works (Hu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2021). Three levels of σ (i.e., σfalse{0.3,0.6,0.9false}$\sigma \in \lbrace 0.3,0.6,0.9\rbrace$) represent a duration uncertainty that is low, medium, or high, respectively.…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the realized activity durations are assumed to follow a right‐skewed lognormal distribution with the mean equal to the deterministic duration and a standard deviation σ representing the duration variability level. The lognormal distribution has also been adopted by some other works (Hu et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2021). Three levels of σ (i.e., σfalse{0.3,0.6,0.9false}$\sigma \in \lbrace 0.3,0.6,0.9\rbrace$) represent a duration uncertainty that is low, medium, or high, respectively.…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to solution robustness, two main strands of research, i.e., the research on robust resource allocation and the research on time buffering, have been extensively explored in the literature (Liang et al, 2020). Regarding the research on robust resource allocation, interested readers are referred to Artigues et al (2003), Leus and Herroelen (2004), Deblaere et al (2007) and Wang et al (2021). Since the disruptions caused by uncertainties will eventually be reflected in the variability of the activity duration, many studies support inserting time buffers in front of activities to absorb potential delays coming from predecessors and to prevent the propagation of delays throughout the baseline schedule, thereby protecting the activity start times as well as possible.…”
Section: Proactive Project Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the environment of stochastic resource availabilities, resource buffers are beneficial to improving schedule robustness, and the combination of resource buffers and time buffers performs the best [15]. Thirdly, about resource allocation, resource flow network is introduced and many algorithms have been developed, such as branch-and-bound algorithm [16], integer programming-based heuristics [17], multi-objective algorithms [18], and heuristic algorithm of maximizing the use of precedence relations [19]. In addition, the scheduling problem of integrating resource allocation and time buffering together has also been investigated [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%