1994
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(94)90016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A benefit segmentation of the major donor market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The NPO can be seen to be more accountable and trustworthy. As Cermak, File, and Prince (1994) noted in their study, people who are motivated to donate by a combination of social ties and humanitarian factors represent the largest segment of donors in nonprofit business. There is psychological advantage from personal referrals as potential and new members are likely to trust people they know.…”
Section: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly Xx(x) Theme 3: Finamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NPO can be seen to be more accountable and trustworthy. As Cermak, File, and Prince (1994) noted in their study, people who are motivated to donate by a combination of social ties and humanitarian factors represent the largest segment of donors in nonprofit business. There is psychological advantage from personal referrals as potential and new members are likely to trust people they know.…”
Section: Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly Xx(x) Theme 3: Finamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that different motives affect philanthropy for different groups of people (Cermak et al 1994;Mount & Kaciak 2003;Van Slyke et al 2007;Van Slyke & Brooks 2005). Stated differently, personal characteristics of donors moderate the effects of the eight mechanisms.…”
Section: How Do Donors Differ In Their Responsiveness To the Eight Mementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Do segmentations of the "average donor market" and the major donor market (Cermak et al 1994;Greeves 2006;Prince & File 2001) look the same?…”
Section: Do Different Motives Motivate Large and Small Donations?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os fundamentos teóricos do comportamento do individuo que pratica a filantropia pode ser entendido como uma forma de intercambio social, onde os individuo interagem para praticar o bem e conviver com pessoas que fazem a mesma coisa (Bumett & Wood, 1988). A prática da filantropia é natural e inerente ao ser humano esta ligada ao sentimento individual de humanitarismo e espiritualismo de cada pessoa (Arnett, German, & Hunt, 2003;Cermak, File, & Prince, 1994).…”
unclassified
“…A doação gera aos doadores benefícios fiscais e sociais, os benefícios fiscais são as isenções de impostos, e os benefícios sociais são a satisfação pessoal, e aumento da autoestima (Arnett, German, & Hunt, 2003;Cermak, File, & Prince, 1994). A filantropia é uma atitude de praticar o bem de forma recíproca, faz bem a quem da e a quem recebe (Arnould, Price, & Zinkhan, 2004) A razão para que uma ESFL não contabilizar a subvenção de serviços esta relacionada com a falta de uma determinação legal que obrigue a contabilização do trabalho voluntario.…”
unclassified