2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327744joce1402_01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Behavioral Model of Digital Music Piracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
146
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
146
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This has resulted in challenges and opportunities for entities involved in the production, distribution, and consumption of such digital goods (Bakos, Brynjolfsson, and Lichtman 1999;Gopal, Bhattacharjee, and Sanders 2006). But this same technology also provides the means for unau thorized copying and distribution of such goods (Gopal and Sanders 1997;Gopal et al 2004). The popularity and availability of online music file-sharing music industry legal actions there is little to confirm or refute the claims of interested parties such as RIAA and the music industry or Kazaa and Grokster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has resulted in challenges and opportunities for entities involved in the production, distribution, and consumption of such digital goods (Bakos, Brynjolfsson, and Lichtman 1999;Gopal, Bhattacharjee, and Sanders 2006). But this same technology also provides the means for unau thorized copying and distribution of such goods (Gopal and Sanders 1997;Gopal et al 2004). The popularity and availability of online music file-sharing music industry legal actions there is little to confirm or refute the claims of interested parties such as RIAA and the music industry or Kazaa and Grokster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhattacharjee, Gopal, Lertwachara and Marsden (2003) model music purchasing and pirating behavior of consumers using different pricing models to determine revenue-maximizing strategies for the seller in the face of online music piracy. Gopal et al (2004) present a behavioral model of digital audio piracy where the determinants are age, gender, ethical predispositions and money saved using an MP3. Rayna (2007) shows how the public nature of digital goods explains the development of the piracy phenomenon.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gopal, Sanders, Bhattacharjee, Agrawal and Wagner (2004) and Rayna (2007) show that following Samuelson (1954), digital goods are collective goods due to their inherent properties of non-rivalry and non-excludability. Digital pirating behavior is a free-riding behavior as the Internet user copies digital goods without paying for them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the crimes that are incorporated into this category include counterfeiting, identity theft, corporate theft, component theft, and piracy. Digital piracy is the act of copying digital goods (i.e., software, documents, audio, and video) without permission from and compensation to the copyright holder using computer technology [17][18][19]. Digital piracy is one area of research that has emerged within cyber criminology and covers topics such as music, gaming, and other computer programs.…”
Section: New Types Of Crime and Delinquencymentioning
confidence: 99%