1989
DOI: 10.2307/2937864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Behavioral Explanation for Normal Wage Rigidity During the Great Depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the size of the output decline associated with this episode was generally much larger than comparable deflations during other periods (Graph 2). In addition, more of the contraction of aggregate demand went into output than into prices and nominal wages than in 1919-1921, reflecting in large part the presence of important structural rigidities (Bordo, Erceg and Evans (1997), Hanes and James (2001), O'Brien (1989)). …”
Section: -1933 (The Great Contraction): An Ugly Deflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the size of the output decline associated with this episode was generally much larger than comparable deflations during other periods (Graph 2). In addition, more of the contraction of aggregate demand went into output than into prices and nominal wages than in 1919-1921, reflecting in large part the presence of important structural rigidities (Bordo, Erceg and Evans (1997), Hanes and James (2001), O'Brien (1989)). …”
Section: -1933 (The Great Contraction): An Ugly Deflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 18 Kendrick's data shows that real output fell only around 3 percent in the early 1920s, but real consumption and investment actually increased. Thus, the 1921-22 recession largely reflects a decline in government purchases, which partially reflects the postwar Presidents Hoover and Roosevelt shared similar goals of fostering industrial collusion and increasing real wages and raising labor's bargaining power.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was as if the simultaneous occurrence of wage rate cuts and perhaps the steepest depression yet experienced in U.S. history was perceived as proof that such cuts were the cause of the depression, rather than a cure which helped bring the downturn to an end. Anthony Patrick O'Brien (1989) has shown that, by the mid-1920s, many employers had publicly announced that wage rates would not be reduced during the next downturn because of the view that changes in wage rates lead to corresponding changes in purchasing power.…”
Section: "The Employer's Dilemma" --An Early Statement Of the High-wamentioning
confidence: 98%