2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2016.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A beam search heuristic for scheduling a single machine with release dates and sequence dependent setup times to minimize the makespan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, sequence-dependent processing times between jobs have not been taken into account until recently (Vallada & Ruiz, 2011;Sereshti & Bijari, 2013). Furthermore, research papers related to the problem of parallel machine scheduling with setup times/costs have mainly focused on makespan minimization (Vélez-Gallego et al 2016;Xanthopoulos et al, 2016). When addressing due-date related objective functions, the majority of research articles have approached the minimization of tardiness.…”
Section: Scheduling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, sequence-dependent processing times between jobs have not been taken into account until recently (Vallada & Ruiz, 2011;Sereshti & Bijari, 2013). Furthermore, research papers related to the problem of parallel machine scheduling with setup times/costs have mainly focused on makespan minimization (Vélez-Gallego et al 2016;Xanthopoulos et al, 2016). When addressing due-date related objective functions, the majority of research articles have approached the minimization of tardiness.…”
Section: Scheduling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major concern of scheduling is how to provide a perfect match or near perfect match between machines and jobs and subsequently determine the processing sequence of the jobs on each machine to achieve certain classic objectives such as minimize makespan (Hung et al, 2017). Finding a feasible schedule is sufficient for most manufacturers (Hung et al, 2017) who mostly prefer the use of simple heuristic algorithms, such as dispatching policies (Montoya-Torres et al, 2016).…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many studies focused on developing solution algorithms to solve the single-machine scheduling with release times; Genetic Algorithm (GA; [17]), learning-based Branch-and-bound of [18,19], Simulated Annealing of [20], Ant Colony Optimization of [21], and the hybrid GA developed by [22] are the seminal examples. Some studies extended the basic single-machine scheduling with release times, for example through developing a two-agent singlemachine problem with release time [23], considering expiration time in addition to the release times [24], and including sequence-dependent setup times [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the production environment, the single-machine scheduling problem (SMSP) is one of the most common scheduling problems that have been studied in the past few decades. However, in some real-world manufacturing systems, studying the SMSP under the setup consideration between jobs is also required such as the manufacturing systems in painting and metalworking industries [2]. Comprehensive reviews regarding the setup consideration are provided [3][4][5] for all scheduling problem environments such as the single-machine scheduling, parallel machine scheduling, and flow shop scheduling problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ant colony optimization was presented in [16] to minimize job tardiness for an SMSP with sequence-dependent setups. A single-machine scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times and release dates had been less studied [2,17,18]; one of these studies is [2] where a beam search and mixed-integer linear model were used to study the SMSP subject to the release date and nonanticipatory dependent setup time to minimize the makespan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%