2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01641.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Bayesian Adjustment for Multiplicative Measurement Errors for a Calibration Problem with Application to a Stem Cell Study

Abstract: We develop a Bayesian approach to a calibration problem with one interested covariate subject to multiplicative measurement errors. Our work is motivated by a stem cell study with the objective of establishing the recommended minimum doses for stem cell engraftment after a blood transplant. When determining a safe stem cell dose based on the prefreeze samples, the postcryopreservation recovery rate enters in the model as a multiplicative measurement error term, as shown in the model. We examine the impact of i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model assumes a lognormal-based multiplicative Berkson-type measurement error in the concentrations, which can be viewed as “explanatory variables” from a regression modeling standpoint. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the model structure of Fig 1 is novel—it is different from well-established statistical procedures [ 25 , 27 ] that focus on classical measurement error, and it is also different from the literature on additive Berkson-type measurement error [ 28 , 29 ] and prior work on bounded multiplicative Berkson-type measurement errors [ 30 ].…”
Section: Bayesian Inference For Light Scattering Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model assumes a lognormal-based multiplicative Berkson-type measurement error in the concentrations, which can be viewed as “explanatory variables” from a regression modeling standpoint. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, the model structure of Fig 1 is novel—it is different from well-established statistical procedures [ 25 , 27 ] that focus on classical measurement error, and it is also different from the literature on additive Berkson-type measurement error [ 28 , 29 ] and prior work on bounded multiplicative Berkson-type measurement errors [ 30 ].…”
Section: Bayesian Inference For Light Scattering Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model assumes a lognormal-based multiplicative Berkson-type measurement error in the concentrations, which can be viewed as "explanatory variables" from a regression modeling standpoint. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this model structure is novel -it is different from well-established statistical procedures (Hwang, 1986;Carroll et al, 2006) that focus on classical measurement error, and it is also different from the literature on additive Berkson-type measurement error (Rudemo et al, 1989;Muff et al, 2015) and prior work on bounded multiplicative Berkson-type measurement errors (Zhang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Connections With Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%