2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3129252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Backtracking Ensemble Pruning Based Reconfiguration Method for Time-Triggered Flows in TTEthernet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of SMT solvers requires the routing of flows to be determined in advance, while the selection of different routes can have a significant impact on the scheduling success rate and network performance metrics. Sequential solving makes online recon-figuration challenging to solve and optimize, as poorly designed routes lead to solving failures and backtracking to new routes, which repeatedly increases solving time and reduces solving efficiency [24]. Therefore, it is more sensible to solve traffic routing and scheduling as a single optimization problem with joint routing and scheduling techniques, whereby ILP is a more widely adopted design approach [17,[25][26][27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the use of SMT solvers requires the routing of flows to be determined in advance, while the selection of different routes can have a significant impact on the scheduling success rate and network performance metrics. Sequential solving makes online recon-figuration challenging to solve and optimize, as poorly designed routes lead to solving failures and backtracking to new routes, which repeatedly increases solving time and reduces solving efficiency [24]. Therefore, it is more sensible to solve traffic routing and scheduling as a single optimization problem with joint routing and scheduling techniques, whereby ILP is a more widely adopted design approach [17,[25][26][27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if p A = 8, p B = 12 and l A = l B = 1, thus lcm = 24 and gcd = 4. When the time-slots occupied by TT flow A are predetermined to be [1,9,17], there are gcd−1 gcd × p B = 4−1 4 × 12 = 9 number of scenarios in which TT flow B can be scheduled, namely [2,14], [3,15], [4,16], [6,18], [7,19], [8,20], [10,22], [11,23], [12,24].…”
Section: Scheduling Compatibility (Sc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the current conflict graph-based approach only supports zero-queuing scheduling, which limits its scalability to the general case. Our previous research extended the application scenario of network layer reconfiguration by combining the application migration decision problem with routing and scheduling [13]. Moreover, we optimized the reconfiguration routing algorithm by incorporating scheduling compatibility, which explored the trade-off between reconfiguration solution success rate, efficiency, and quality under different redundant resource states of the network [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%