2007 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers 2007
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2007.373377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 7.5Gb/s 10-Tap DFE Receiver with First Tap Partial Response, Spectrally Gated Adaptation, and 2nd-Order Data-Filtered CDR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it increases the relative strength of the high-frequency components of the transmitted signals, crosstalk is also reduced [8]. Near-end channel equalisation is often implemented using finite impulse [9] 130 nm −12 dB (26″ FR4) 5 -1-tap -Balan et al [10] 130 nm −(40″ FR4) 6.4 2-tap 4-tap t L Wong et al [11] 9 0 n m −6.2 dB (10″ SMA) 6.0 -2-tap 10 −12 Park et al [12] 9 0 n m −12 dB (16″ Tyco) 7.0 -2-tap 10 −13 Leibowitz et al [13] 9 0n m −(18″ BP) −7.5 -10-tap 10 −12 Bulzacchelli et al [14] 9 0n m −33 dB (16″ Legacy BP) 10 4-tap 5-tap 10 −12 Hidaka et al [15] 9 0 n m −25.4 dB (29″ FR4) 10 response (FIR) filters that introduce zeros to offset the effect of the poles of the channels [45,46]. For example, the first-order pre-emphasis FIR filter shown in Fig.…”
Section: Near-end Channel Equalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since it increases the relative strength of the high-frequency components of the transmitted signals, crosstalk is also reduced [8]. Near-end channel equalisation is often implemented using finite impulse [9] 130 nm −12 dB (26″ FR4) 5 -1-tap -Balan et al [10] 130 nm −(40″ FR4) 6.4 2-tap 4-tap t L Wong et al [11] 9 0 n m −6.2 dB (10″ SMA) 6.0 -2-tap 10 −12 Park et al [12] 9 0 n m −12 dB (16″ Tyco) 7.0 -2-tap 10 −13 Leibowitz et al [13] 9 0n m −(18″ BP) −7.5 -10-tap 10 −12 Bulzacchelli et al [14] 9 0n m −33 dB (16″ Legacy BP) 10 4-tap 5-tap 10 −12 Hidaka et al [15] 9 0 n m −25.4 dB (29″ FR4) 10 response (FIR) filters that introduce zeros to offset the effect of the poles of the channels [45,46]. For example, the first-order pre-emphasis FIR filter shown in Fig.…”
Section: Near-end Channel Equalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the output of the summer directly Fig. 8 Clocked re-generative sense amplifier as slicer [13,15,61,62] www.ietdl.org feeds the slicer, a large output voltage of the summer is essential to minimise slicer error. Increasing the dimension of the input transistors improves output voltage swing, it, however, also reduces the speed.…”
Section: Arithmetic Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All need to be completed within one UI for tap-1. Loop-unrolling has been proven to be an effective technique in meeting the timing constraint of the tap-1 of DFE [19,[58][59][60]. High-order loop-unrolling also emerged when data rate exceeds 10 Gb/s, however, at the cost of high silicon consumption [10,11,61].…”
Section: Channel Equalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedforward path, however, was realized by a sample-and-hold (S/H) circuit which may generate feedthrough noise. In [10], either zero-offset edge sample or non-zero-offset edge sample is selected as the input of the CDR loop filter based on three consecutive data samples to avoid the bi-modal jitter distribution of the CDR output. Because the current data sample has to be determined before selecting the edge sample, however, the timing margin cannot be relaxed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%