2009 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - Digest of Technical Papers 2009
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2009.4977441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 65nm CMOS comparator with modified latch to achieve 7GHz/1.3mW at 1.2V and 700MHz/47µW at 0.6V

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the effective load capacitance of the latch is reduced in comparison to that of N2 and N3 directly connected to the output nodes. Another reason for the lower input-referred offset is the amplification of CINP-CINN for the initial voltage difference, which causes the latch to switch higher than in other structures (e.g., in [14]), where the input transistors and the latch are parallel (additional parallel load at the output nodes). Disadvantageous is the fact that, due to the many stacked transistors, a sufficient high supply voltage is needed for a proper delay time [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the effective load capacitance of the latch is reduced in comparison to that of N2 and N3 directly connected to the output nodes. Another reason for the lower input-referred offset is the amplification of CINP-CINN for the initial voltage difference, which causes the latch to switch higher than in other structures (e.g., in [14]), where the input transistors and the latch are parallel (additional parallel load at the output nodes). Disadvantageous is the fact that, due to the many stacked transistors, a sufficient high supply voltage is needed for a proper delay time [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I summarizes the performance of the proposed dynamic comparator. Finally, Table II, compares the performance of the proposed comparator with the designs presented in [6], [9] and [10]. In 90nm CMOS and V DD =0.5V, the proposed comparator provides the maximum sampling of 0.33GHz while consuming 2.3µW power.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, one of the most effective approaches is to develop new circuit structures which avoid stacking of too many transistors between especially if they do not increase the circuit complexity. In [6], additional circuitry is added to the conventional dynamic comparator to enhance the comparator speed in low supply voltages. Despite effectiveness, the additional circuitry is power hungry and area-inefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many analyses such as noise, offset [5]; random decision errors and kick back noise [6] are present. In this, an analysis of existing clocked regenerative comparators such as conventional dynamic comparator [7][8], double tail comparator [9] and modified double tail comparator [10] is analyzed practically. Based on the results obtained a new dynamic double-tail comparator is proposed which improves the performance over existing comparators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%