2008
DOI: 10.3178/hrl.2.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 59-year (1948-2006) global near-surface meteorological data set for land surface models. Part I: Development of daily forcing and assessment of precipitation intensity

Abstract: Abstract:This paper describes the development and assessment of global 0.5°near-surface atmospheric data from 1948 to 2006 at daily (for precipitation, snowfall, and specific humidity) to 3-hourly (for temperature, shortwave radiation, and longwave radiation) time scales, which can be used to drive land surface models. Using newly available monthly precipitation and temperature data extending to recent years, the variables were created by statistical methods, the parameters of which were obtained from availabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To describe the fate of the three glaciers, we calculated their mass balance and ELA using an energy-mass balance model (18), employing recently archived gridded climate datasets (19,20). We downscaled daily air temperature and precipitation in the datasets with those observed close to the glaciers for short periods (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To describe the fate of the three glaciers, we calculated their mass balance and ELA using an energy-mass balance model (18), employing recently archived gridded climate datasets (19,20). We downscaled daily air temperature and precipitation in the datasets with those observed close to the glaciers for short periods (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain the spatial distribution of the ELA trend, air temperature, solar radiation, and precipitation were used from the datasets described above (19,20). We did not employ downscaling of the input or calibration with the mass balance except for air temperature, for which we reduced the annual variability of the gridded air temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no wet-day frequency correction in some studies [Zhao and Dirmeyer, 2003;Ngo-Duc et al, 2005;Hanasaki et al, 2008]. However, many studies account for some wet-day frequency correction [Sheffield et al, 2006;Hirabayashi et al, 2008a;Weedon et al, 2011Weedon et al, , 2014Iizumi et al, 2014], although the methodological details vary by study. The rainfall/snowfall partition was made using various methods including the use of original reanalysis rainfall and snowfall rates [Zhao and Dirmeyer, 2003;Weedon et al, 2011], a simple temperature threshold [Ngo-Duc et al, 2005] and an empirical function of wet bulb temperature [Hirabayashi et al, 2008b;Hanasaki et al, 2008].…”
Section: A3 Differences Between S14fd and Other Major Forcing Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although bias correction is an unavoidable procedure for using GCM outputs as the inputs of impact models, it is an additional source of uncertainty in climate risk assessments because different bias-correction methods and reference daily weather data sets often lead to different impact outcomes Hawkins et al, 2013;Seaby et al, 2015;Baker et al, 2016]. Global retrospective meteorological forcing data sets, a hybrid of reanalysis data and gridded observations [e.g., Sheffield et al, 2006;Hanasaki et al, 2008;Hirabayashi et al, 2008a;Weedon et al, 2011Weedon et al, , 2014Iizumi et al, 2014], are used as the reference climatology in impact communities when bias correction is conducted at the global scale [e.g., Hempel et al, 2013]. Earlier work examined the uncertainties in the projected climate extremes associated with Representative Concentration Pathways IIZUMI ET AL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%