2015
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/809/1/l14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ∼50,000 M SOLAR MASS BLACK HOLE IN THE NUCLEUS OF RGG 118

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
236
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
13
236
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The isolation of the system, however, implies that whatever morphological changes Was 49b underwent happened during the beginning of its encounter with Was 49a, and so it has not been severely tidally stripped (unlike, for example, the SMBH-hosting ultracompact dwarf galaxy M60-UCD1; Seth et al 2014), suggesting that the SMBH was intrinsically overmassive or that perhaps the black hole's growth during the early phase of the merger happened well before the buildup of its host galaxy (e.g., Medling et al 2015; see also the Discussion in van Loon & Sansom 2015). If Was 49b was originally a late-type/dwarf galaxy, its SMBH is a factor of 10 2 -10 4 as massive as other black holes found in this galaxy type, which are typically between 10 4 and 10 6   M (e.g., Filippenko & Ho 2003;Barth et al 2004;Izotov & Thuan 2008;Shields et al 2008;Reines et al 2011Reines et al , 2013Dong et al 2012;Secrest et al 2012Secrest et al , 2013Secrest et al , 2015Maksym et al 2014;Moran et al 2014;Baldassare et al 2015Baldassare et al , 2016Mezcua et al 2016;Satyapal et al 2016), potentially giving new insight into how SMBHs form and grow in isolated systems. For example, recent work has suggested that black hole mass growth at higher redshifts precedes bulge growth (e.g., Zhang et al 2012), while other work has found no such effect (e.g., Schulze & Wisotzki 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isolation of the system, however, implies that whatever morphological changes Was 49b underwent happened during the beginning of its encounter with Was 49a, and so it has not been severely tidally stripped (unlike, for example, the SMBH-hosting ultracompact dwarf galaxy M60-UCD1; Seth et al 2014), suggesting that the SMBH was intrinsically overmassive or that perhaps the black hole's growth during the early phase of the merger happened well before the buildup of its host galaxy (e.g., Medling et al 2015; see also the Discussion in van Loon & Sansom 2015). If Was 49b was originally a late-type/dwarf galaxy, its SMBH is a factor of 10 2 -10 4 as massive as other black holes found in this galaxy type, which are typically between 10 4 and 10 6   M (e.g., Filippenko & Ho 2003;Barth et al 2004;Izotov & Thuan 2008;Shields et al 2008;Reines et al 2011Reines et al , 2013Dong et al 2012;Secrest et al 2012Secrest et al , 2013Secrest et al , 2015Maksym et al 2014;Moran et al 2014;Baldassare et al 2015Baldassare et al , 2016Mezcua et al 2016;Satyapal et al 2016), potentially giving new insight into how SMBHs form and grow in isolated systems. For example, recent work has suggested that black hole mass growth at higher redshifts precedes bulge growth (e.g., Zhang et al 2012), while other work has found no such effect (e.g., Schulze & Wisotzki 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, for the (M BH -M sph ) relation. Y on X-axis regression, dashed lines: symmetric regression), the data that the authors used to obtain them as triangles with error bars (black/gray for ellipticals/spirals), the empty diamonds are two other IMBH candidates (LEDA87300: e.g., Baldassare et al 2015;Graham et al 2016 and Pox52: e.g., Barth et al 2004;Thornton et al 2008;Ciambur 2016), and the colored data points are our results. The green stars come from the Sérsic index, the blue squares from pitch angle and the red circles from the FP-BH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The handful of identified dwarf IMBH lie on the usual M BH − σ scaling relation, where M BH is the black hole mass and σ is the dwarf stellar velocity dispersion. However these same dwarfs fall below the M BH −M * scaling relation where M * is the stellar mass (Baldassare et al 2015;Reines & Volonteri 2015). One can possibly interpret this as IMBH-induced suppression of star formation in dwarfs that occurred in the early gas-rich phase of dwarf evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Active galactic nuclei are found in about 1% of dwarfs, with the x-ray luminosities well in excess of an x-ray binary contribution as predicted from the star formation rate (Baldassare et al 2016). For any reasonable duty cycle, there must be IMBH in at least 10% of dwarfs, and one cannot exclude a larger fraction because of the special circumstances required for the shallow gravitational potentials of dwarfs to retain gas as effectively as their massive counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%