2005
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2005.848027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2.4-GHz RF sampling receiver front-end in 0.18-/spl mu/m CMOS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other published works, the receivers based on subsampling were implemented experimentally for only fixed bands. Thus, low-noise subsampling implementations for the 2.1 GHz band [30] and for 2.4 GHz (IEEE 802.11a/g WLAN standards) [31] have been proposed. In [30], an IC receiver designed in 0.18 μm CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) was presented, the main goal of which was a tunable LC (inductor, capacitor) filter implementation.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Implemented Multi-standards Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other published works, the receivers based on subsampling were implemented experimentally for only fixed bands. Thus, low-noise subsampling implementations for the 2.1 GHz band [30] and for 2.4 GHz (IEEE 802.11a/g WLAN standards) [31] have been proposed. In [30], an IC receiver designed in 0.18 μm CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) was presented, the main goal of which was a tunable LC (inductor, capacitor) filter implementation.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Implemented Multi-standards Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [30], an IC receiver designed in 0.18 μm CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) was presented, the main goal of which was a tunable LC (inductor, capacitor) filter implementation. In [31], a 0.18 μm CMOS receiver represented the most complete subsampling receiver reference, due to the optimization performed for parameters, such as thermal noise level, jitter-induced noise and nonlinearity. Finally, there were also receivers based on subsampling for ultra wideband (UWB) applications, such the one in [32], which operates in the 3.1 -10.6 GHz band with low power consumption.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Implemented Multi-standards Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost effectiveness and the design reusability of the transmitter and receiver architecture became a key issue and the approaches based on the software radio (SR) paradigm [1] and RF sampling [2] begun to furnish viable solutions even for consumer applications. The acquisition and successive quantization of the received signal, indeed, allow a numerical manipulation of the signal with evident advantages in terms of re-configurability and adaptability of the receiver to different standards, most of all, when these operations are performable over a wide RF input frequency range covering several telecommunication standards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the state-of-the-art, the receiver architecture still relies on a preliminary down conversion to match the available ADCs and DSPs performances. As an alternative to the mixer, the sample & hold (S/H) mixer can perform the down conversion operation with comparable performances [2]. The resulting structures are usually referred as software defined radio (SDR) receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the feasibility of CMOS D-T radio receivers using RF sampling has been demonstrated for Bluetooth [1], GSM/GPRS [2] and WLAN [3]. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%