2020
DOI: 10.1109/lssc.2020.3005784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 2.18-pJ/conversion, 1656-μm² Temperature Sensor With a 0.61-pJ·K² FoM and 52-pW Stand-By Power

Abstract: DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performances of the trimmed thermal sensor ( Figure 3 ) are compared with recently reported digital temperature sensors [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] in Table 2 . The experimental results of 25 measured DTS samples are in good agreement with the majority of referred data [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 24 ], providing low inaccuracy in a wide temperature range. Furthermore, the proposed trimmed DTS can be supplied with an extended domain of supply voltages.…”
Section: Trimming a Digital Temperature Sensor With Eeprom Fusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The performances of the trimmed thermal sensor ( Figure 3 ) are compared with recently reported digital temperature sensors [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ] in Table 2 . The experimental results of 25 measured DTS samples are in good agreement with the majority of referred data [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 18 , 19 , 21 , 24 ], providing low inaccuracy in a wide temperature range. Furthermore, the proposed trimmed DTS can be supplied with an extended domain of supply voltages.…”
Section: Trimming a Digital Temperature Sensor With Eeprom Fusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the proposed trimmed DTS can be supplied with an extended domain of supply voltages. The presented digital sensor achieves its performance by calibration to just one point, while the inaccuracies obtained in [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 11 , 13 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 24 ] are performed using the two-point calibration method. With regards to power consumption, the investigated sensor reaches an acceptable value in comparison with [ 11 , 12 , 18 , 22 ].…”
Section: Trimming a Digital Temperature Sensor With Eeprom Fusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(a)], an ADC comparator with pMOS input transistors is used. Furthermore, the SAR ADC (except for the memory cells) is automatically power gated [5] after the conversion is finished (Fig. 3) to minimize the leakage power of the CDC.…”
Section: E Sar Adc With Automatic Power Gatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a compact SAR ADC with unit-length digital-to-analog (DAC) capacitors [4] is used to reduce the number of capacitors and the value of the unit capacitor. Furthermore, an automatic power-gating technique [5] is exploited to minimize the leakage power of the all-dynamic CDC. This letter is an extended version of [6], and it is organized as follows: the proposed CDC is introduced in Section II, the measurement results are presented in Section III, and conclusions are drawn in Section IV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%