A 1-Year Study of Endurance Runners: Training, Laboratory Tests, and Field Tests

Galbraith, Andy; Hopker, James G.; Cardinale, Marco; Cunniffe, Brian; Passfield, Louis

doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0508

Cited by 19 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The goal is not to tolerate lactic acid buildup, rather the goal is to lessen lactic acid (hydrogen ion) production at a given work rate (or race pace in athletics) (8). This is accomplished by training at moderate, threshold, and interval intensities-training at or near V _ O 2 max-with short rest intervals, resulting in an increased aerobic contribution to energy production and a higher lactate threshold, the threshold where hydrogen ion accumulates (2,8,12,20,42). Ability Groups: must use these for both aerobic and muscle fitness (strength/endurance) training.…”

Section: Aerobic Training (Neal Baumgartner)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives on Aerobic and Strength Influences on Military Physical Readiness

Friedl

Knapik

Häkkinen

et al. 2015

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Physical fitness training of military recruits is an enduring focus of armies. This is important for safe and effective performance of general tasks that anyone may have to perform in a military setting as well as preparation for more specialized training in specific job specialties. Decades of studies on occupationally specific physical requirements have characterized the dual aerobic and strength demands of typical military tasks; however, scientifically founded strategies to prepare recruits with a good mix of these 2 physiologically opposing capabilities have not been well established. High levels of aerobic training can compromise resistance training gains and increase injury rates. Resistance training requires a greater commitment of time and resources as well as a greater understanding of the science to produce true strength gains that may be beneficial to military performance. These are critical issues for modern armies with increased demands for well-prepared soldiers and fewer injury losses. The actual physical requirements tied to metrics of success in military jobs are also under renewed examination as women are increasingly integrated into military jobs previously performed only by men. At the third International Congress on Soldiers' Physical Performance, a roundtable of 10 physiologists with military expertise presented comparative perspectives on aerobic and strength training. These topics included the physiological basis of training benefits, how to train effectively, how to measure training effectiveness, considerations for the integration of women, and the big perspective. Key discussion points centered on (a) the significance of findings from research on integrated training, (b) strategies for effective strength development, and

show abstract

Section: Aerobic Training (Neal Baumgartner)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Perspectives on Aerobic and Strength Influences on Military Physical Readiness

Friedl

Knapik

Häkkinen

et al. 2015

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The treadmill (Run Race 800; Technogym, Gambettola, Italy) was maintained at 1% grade throughout the test, a standard method to simulate level running on treadmill. All subjects were familiarized to run on treadmill (Galbraith et al, 2014).…”

Section: Incremental Test To Exhaustionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Different Training Intensity Distribution in Recreational Runners

Festa

Tarperi

Skroče

et al. 2020

Front. Sports Act. Living

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To compare the impact of two different training intensity distributions in terms of conditional and performance parameters and spent time to training in recreational athletes.Methods: Two different training intensity distribution model were performed for 8 weeks by 38 recreational runners. Runners recruited were randomly assigned to 2 different training models based on HR intensity detected with maximal test. The percentage distribution splitted in zone 1, 2, and 3 were by 77/3/20 and 40/50/10 in polarized endurance training group (PET) and focused endurance training (FOC) group, respectively. Programs were balanced for total training impulse (TRIMP). To evaluate effects of training, before and after treatment were performed a maximal exercise test to determine Maximal Oxygen Uptake (V'O 2max ), Ventilatory Threshold (VT), respiratory-compensation point (RCT) Running Economy (RE), and 2 Km performance. To investigate the effects of training on muscular performance were performed one repetition maximum (1 RM), squat jump (SJ), and counter movement jump (CMJ).Results: Both groups significantly improved their velocity at V'O 2max (3.2 and 4.0%), at VT (4.0 and 3.2%), RCT (5.7 and 3.4%), the average velocity in 2 Km performance (3.5 and 3.0%) and RE (−5.3 and −8.7%) for PET and FOC, respectively for each variable. No differences were found between the groups on any parameter investigated except about the total training time (PET = 29.9 ± 3.1 h and FOC = 24.8 ± 2.0 h). Conclusion: Focused Endurance Training obtains similar improvements than PolarizedEndurance Training saving 17% of training time in recreational runners.

show abstract

“…Interval training has the advantage of allowing a greater amount of high intensity work to be conducted in a single session than would be possible with continuous training [17]. High-intensity running training, in terms of time spent above lactate threshold velocity, has previously been shown to be a contributing factor to longitudinal increases in performance [8]. Therefore, designing interval training sessions that are individualized to athletes' specific needs is important.…”

Section: Introduction ▼mentioning

confidence: 99%