2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2020.2995351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 0.5-V 3.69-nW Complementary Source-Follower-C Based Low-Pass Filter for Wearable Biomedical Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that for 3 rd -order BPF the device number of the proposed filter is 6-MI-OTAs whereas 8-OTAs are needed for [7]. The proposed filter also offers the best DR compared with BPF and LPF in [7], [38], [39]. Another advantage is the capability of fine-tuning of the lower, higher cut-off frequencies and the bandwidth of the filter.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is evident that for 3 rd -order BPF the device number of the proposed filter is 6-MI-OTAs whereas 8-OTAs are needed for [7]. The proposed filter also offers the best DR compared with BPF and LPF in [7], [38], [39]. Another advantage is the capability of fine-tuning of the lower, higher cut-off frequencies and the bandwidth of the filter.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In Table 4 the filter performance is compared with the 3 rd -order BPF in [7], 5 th order LPF in [38] and 4 th order LPF based on flipped source follower (FSF) in [39]. It is evident that for 3 rd -order BPF the device number of the proposed filter is 6-MI-OTAs whereas 8-OTAs are needed for [7].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic range (DR=20×log(Vrmsmax/Vrms-noise)) for LPF and BPF for 1 % THD while rms noise was integrated over the filter bandwidth was calculated to be equal to 57.6 dB and 60.4 dB, respectively. Table III compares the proposed work with some previous related works [20,21,22,39,40,41], where the following figure of merit (FoM) [40], has been used for better comparison: ( ) ( )…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is evident that the proposed filters offer the best FOM, less number of active devices, the lowest voltage supply and the best low voltage capability from all others OTA-C based filters [20,22,39,40]. Compared with filters based on cascade of two stages of transistor-level biquad flipped voltage follower (FVF) [21] and flipped source follower (FSF) [41] the proposed filter still offers better dynamic range. Note that, the cascade biquad filters are pseudo differential structures that requires additional signal conditioning at the input.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation