1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1003109819256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We examined whether the communication assessed by the large-scale QL tests involved simplistic, procedural, or conceptual communication, or asked for representations (simplistic = 1; procedural = 2; conceptual = 3; representation = 4). This coding scheme was adapted from previous studies on mathematical writing (Kosko et al 2009;Shield and Galbraith 1998). The codes were assigned so that every item that contained any of these codes was assigned each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examined whether the communication assessed by the large-scale QL tests involved simplistic, procedural, or conceptual communication, or asked for representations (simplistic = 1; procedural = 2; conceptual = 3; representation = 4). This coding scheme was adapted from previous studies on mathematical writing (Kosko et al 2009;Shield and Galbraith 1998). The codes were assigned so that every item that contained any of these codes was assigned each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work with middle school students, we have studied both writing about opinions and feelings, what Shield and Galbraith (1998) call journal writing, and expository writing in what we call math journals (Baxter, Woodward, Olson, & Robyns, 2002a). Expository writing is intended to describe and explain (cf.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Writing takes different forms in mathematics classes, ranging from more formal assessments, where carefully edited papers that present a logical argument are the goal (Morgan, 1998), to less-structured, impromptu journal writing that provides students with opportunities to explain their thinking about mathematical ideas (Shield & Galbraith, 1998). Our present analysis focuses on the latter form, which is also known as writing to learn (Connolly, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Komunikasi matematika menjadi bagian penting dalam pengembangan pemahaman matematika siswa (NCTM, 2000). Hasil penelitian terdahulu menunjukkan bahwa komunikasi matematika dapat mengembangkan pemahaman matematis siswa (Albert, 2000;Martin, 2015;Pugalee, 2001Pugalee, , 2004Santos & Semana, 2015;Shield & Galbraith, 1998;Sierpinska, 1998). Oleh karena itu, kemampuan komunikasi matematika seharusnya dikuasai siswa dalam proses pembelajaran matematika.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified