2009
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.v30:16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the role of electrostatics in protein-protein association, the electrostatic component of the binding free energy needs to be accurately calculated. However, there are three major obstacles in in silico modeling of the binding free energy of biological macromolecules: (1) the binding occurs in a water phase consisting of millions of water molecules whose positions and orientations vary dynamically [17][18][19]; (2) the unbound and bound monomers are also dynamical structures existing as an ensemble of structures, and these ensembles could be quite different for unbound versus bound monomers [20][21][22][23][24][25], and (3) the charged states of the ionizable groups may be nonstandard in the unbound and bound monomers and even may change due to the binding [26][27][28][29][30]. Taking the above effects rigorously into account in the computational protocol is a challenge.…”
Section: Modeling the Electrostatic Component Of The Binding Free Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the role of electrostatics in protein-protein association, the electrostatic component of the binding free energy needs to be accurately calculated. However, there are three major obstacles in in silico modeling of the binding free energy of biological macromolecules: (1) the binding occurs in a water phase consisting of millions of water molecules whose positions and orientations vary dynamically [17][18][19]; (2) the unbound and bound monomers are also dynamical structures existing as an ensemble of structures, and these ensembles could be quite different for unbound versus bound monomers [20][21][22][23][24][25], and (3) the charged states of the ionizable groups may be nonstandard in the unbound and bound monomers and even may change due to the binding [26][27][28][29][30]. Taking the above effects rigorously into account in the computational protocol is a challenge.…”
Section: Modeling the Electrostatic Component Of The Binding Free Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The binding mode of ChalcEA on the antagonist-form of hERα42 was predicted using AutoDock 4.2 43. Initially, the co-crystallized ligand, 4-OHT, was re-docked into the ligand-binding site of hERα, resulted in a docking score (free energy of binding) of −9.7 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%