2003
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sandwich hybridisation assay for quantitative detection of yeast RNAs in crude cell lysates

Abstract: Background: A rapid microtiter plate based sandwich hybridization assay was developed for detection and quantification of single RNA species using magnetic beads. Following solution hybridization target RNA molecules were collected by biotin-streptavidin affinity binding and detected by fluorescence signal generated by alkaline phosphatase. The 18S rRNA and SUC2 mRNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were used as model RNA target molecules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure was performed as described by Rautio et al (2003) and Thieme et al (2008) with small modifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The procedure was performed as described by Rautio et al (2003) and Thieme et al (2008) with small modifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sandwich hybridization assays (SHA) are suitable for a rapid and quantitative RNA detection (Rautio et al, 2003 ). These methods are based on the hybridization of a target RNA (or denatured DNA) with two specific oligonucleotide probes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus two hybridization events are involved. In the first event the immobilized capture probe binds to the target sequence binds event, and in the second hybridization event, a signal probe linked to a recorder molecule [ 47 , 48 ], such as a fluorochrome or digoxigenin (DIG) binds to the first complex to facilitate its detection. To detect the target species, only one of the two probes need be specific.…”
Section: Molecular—cell-free Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection is possible only when both probes are hybridized to the target molecule. Unlike PCR, in which the enzyme‐based amplification is affected by the presence of PCR inhibitors, in SHA, there is no amplification, and therefore, the hybridization of the probes can be performed on crude cellular extracts , without lengthy and laborious DNA/RNA extraction and purification steps. Because it shares a similar target identification principle, SHA provides comparable levels of specificity to PCR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these sensors are complicated, costly and require long hybridization times (up to 9 hours) . Therefore, the majority of the widely implemented detection systems are optically‐based and are assisted by low‐cost enzyme‐based signal amplification methods . While this approach is faster (2‐4 hours) than electrochemical sensing, it is approximately five orders of magnitude less sensitive (LoD of 11 pM) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%