2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023846616144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The zeta potential was measured using the same methodology as for the emulsion droplets. Since the F-65 and F-95 particles used in the column experiments were too big to oscillate in the electric field generated by the ESA apparatus, #40 quartz (U.S. Silica, Berkeley Springs, WV), with a median particle diameter of 5.1 µm, was utilized for these measurements, similar to the protocol outlined by Demond et al (32). To obtain the pore-size distribution, the drainage air-water capillary pressure-saturation relationships were measured using the pressure cell and procedure developed by Salehzadeh and Demond (33).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The zeta potential was measured using the same methodology as for the emulsion droplets. Since the F-65 and F-95 particles used in the column experiments were too big to oscillate in the electric field generated by the ESA apparatus, #40 quartz (U.S. Silica, Berkeley Springs, WV), with a median particle diameter of 5.1 µm, was utilized for these measurements, similar to the protocol outlined by Demond et al (32). To obtain the pore-size distribution, the drainage air-water capillary pressure-saturation relationships were measured using the pressure cell and procedure developed by Salehzadeh and Demond (33).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were fitted with the equation given by van Genuchten (34) using the statistical package SYSTAT (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Then using the Young-Laplace equation (35), the capillary pressure was converted to a pore diameter (36,37), assuming that the contact angle was approximately equal to 0°and that the surface tension of water was about 72 dyn/cm (32).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%