Abstract:Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of IAAF Kids' Athletics on motivation, physical fitness and track and field event performance of children (11-12 years old). The IAAF Kids' Athletics is a track and field teaching program that was developed by the IAAF (International Association of Athletics Federation). In total 215 elementary students participated in the study. IAAF Kids' Athletics was implemented in an experimental group and the traditional skill teaching method for track and … Show more
“…The findings of our study are in line with the previous study conducted by Petros et al (2016). The study (Petros et al, 2016) was conducted on elementary school students aged 11 to 12 years for 12 weeks and reported significant improvement in all motor fitness components in Kid's Athletics group than the traditional method group. Petros et al (2016) also suggested that Kid's Athletics may motivate the elementary students to learn track and field as a new sport.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The study (Petros et al, 2016) was conducted on elementary school students aged 11 to 12 years for 12 weeks and reported significant improvement in all motor fitness components in Kid's Athletics group than the traditional method group. Petros et al (2016) also suggested that Kid's Athletics may motivate the elementary students to learn track and field as a new sport. In addition, the Kid's Athletics programme also helped the students to ISSN 1993-7989 (print).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also aims to resolve the issue of early specialization in the training programmes, which temporarily boosts performance at a young age but later becomes a reason for drop out from sport. Previous studies (Calik et al, 2018;Cillik & Willweber, 2018;Petros et al, 2016;Willweber & Cillik, 2018) have tried to find the benefits of Kid's Athletics programme in various age groups (6 to 7 years, and 11 to 12 years) and on motor variables such as sprint, jump, flexibility, agility, coordination, etc. and psychological variables such as self-esteem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and psychological variables such as self-esteem. The duration of the studies ranged from 12 weeks to 6 months (Calik et al, 2018;Cillik & Willweber, 2018;Petros et al, 2016;Willweber & Cillik, 2018). Although the results of the studies reported positive outcomes, there is a lack of research conducted on the short term effect (6 weeks) of Kid's Athletics programme.…”
The purpose of this study was to find the effects of a 12 weeks IAAF Kid’s Athletics programme on the psychological and motor fitness abilities of sedentary school-going children. Materials and methods. The study involved 40 students (age 10 to 14 years) with no previous history of systematic training. The subjects were further sub-divided based on their age, i.e. low age (10 to 11 years) and high age (13 to 14 years), and then randomly assigned to either an experimental group (Kid’s Athletics) or a control group. The psychological variables selected were stress tolerance reactive, simple motor speed, simple reaction speed, visual perception, and focused attention, whereas motor variables selected were sit and reach test, standing broad jump, 50m sprint, T-test, and 150m sprint. Tests were conducted pre-training, mid-training, and post-training for motor variables while only pre-training and post-training tests were conducted for psychological variables. Results. The two-way mixed ANOVA revealed a significant difference in all the selected variables (motor and psychological variables) in group × time interaction (p = 0.001 to <0.001) with large effect sizes. Lager effect sizes in motor fitness variables were observed after 12 weeks (ES = 2.09 to 5.72) than 6 weeks (ES = 1.92 to 3.47) when compared to baseline in the experimental group. Conclusion. The study shows that Kid’s Athletics recommended by IAAF may be considered as an effective programme to improve psychological as well as motor abilities in sedentary school-going children.
“…The findings of our study are in line with the previous study conducted by Petros et al (2016). The study (Petros et al, 2016) was conducted on elementary school students aged 11 to 12 years for 12 weeks and reported significant improvement in all motor fitness components in Kid's Athletics group than the traditional method group. Petros et al (2016) also suggested that Kid's Athletics may motivate the elementary students to learn track and field as a new sport.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The study (Petros et al, 2016) was conducted on elementary school students aged 11 to 12 years for 12 weeks and reported significant improvement in all motor fitness components in Kid's Athletics group than the traditional method group. Petros et al (2016) also suggested that Kid's Athletics may motivate the elementary students to learn track and field as a new sport. In addition, the Kid's Athletics programme also helped the students to ISSN 1993-7989 (print).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also aims to resolve the issue of early specialization in the training programmes, which temporarily boosts performance at a young age but later becomes a reason for drop out from sport. Previous studies (Calik et al, 2018;Cillik & Willweber, 2018;Petros et al, 2016;Willweber & Cillik, 2018) have tried to find the benefits of Kid's Athletics programme in various age groups (6 to 7 years, and 11 to 12 years) and on motor variables such as sprint, jump, flexibility, agility, coordination, etc. and psychological variables such as self-esteem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and psychological variables such as self-esteem. The duration of the studies ranged from 12 weeks to 6 months (Calik et al, 2018;Cillik & Willweber, 2018;Petros et al, 2016;Willweber & Cillik, 2018). Although the results of the studies reported positive outcomes, there is a lack of research conducted on the short term effect (6 weeks) of Kid's Athletics programme.…”
The purpose of this study was to find the effects of a 12 weeks IAAF Kid’s Athletics programme on the psychological and motor fitness abilities of sedentary school-going children. Materials and methods. The study involved 40 students (age 10 to 14 years) with no previous history of systematic training. The subjects were further sub-divided based on their age, i.e. low age (10 to 11 years) and high age (13 to 14 years), and then randomly assigned to either an experimental group (Kid’s Athletics) or a control group. The psychological variables selected were stress tolerance reactive, simple motor speed, simple reaction speed, visual perception, and focused attention, whereas motor variables selected were sit and reach test, standing broad jump, 50m sprint, T-test, and 150m sprint. Tests were conducted pre-training, mid-training, and post-training for motor variables while only pre-training and post-training tests were conducted for psychological variables. Results. The two-way mixed ANOVA revealed a significant difference in all the selected variables (motor and psychological variables) in group × time interaction (p = 0.001 to <0.001) with large effect sizes. Lager effect sizes in motor fitness variables were observed after 12 weeks (ES = 2.09 to 5.72) than 6 weeks (ES = 1.92 to 3.47) when compared to baseline in the experimental group. Conclusion. The study shows that Kid’s Athletics recommended by IAAF may be considered as an effective programme to improve psychological as well as motor abilities in sedentary school-going children.
“…Bila dilihat dari karakteristik gerakannya menurut (Rumini, 2014), kids athletics memiliki gerak dasar yang terdiri dari unsur lari, lompat dan lempar. Mengacu pada konsep tersebut, maka pengembangan kemampuan kids athletics anak harus melalui pendekatan latihan fisik yang memiliki karakteristik berupa gerak dasar motorik lari, lompat dan lempar (Petros et al, 2017). (Rumini, 2014).…”
This study aims to develop a variety of athletic sports learning through pair jump rope and ladder drill training models to improve the kids athletics of elementary school students. The method used was an experimental method through a quantitative approach with a randomized group-pretest-posttest design research design. The population was 32 elementary school students with a sample of grade IV and V students selected by stratified proportional sampling, divided into two groups, each given a pair jump rope model (X1) and ladder drill model (X2). The data collection technique used the Kids Athletics Test IAAF instrument which was analyzed using the t and anava tests at the sig level. α = 0.05. The results of the analysis t count > t Sig..0.05 ( > sig 0.05) means that the pair jump rope training model and the ladder drill training model can improve the kids athletic abilities of elementary school students. Mean while, the analysis of variance test results for each element of kids athletic obtained Fcount > Fsig.0.05 ( > sig 0.05), which means that there is a significant difference between the paired jump rope athletic training model and the ladder drill training model to improve the kids athletic of elementary school students.
With the development of science and technology, modern science and technology are more and more widely used in the field of sports, which not only promotes the scientific development of track and field system teaching but also makes great changes in the way of track and field system teaching. Many methods of sports evaluation using modern science and technology have been accepted by people and have been widely used in teaching, especially in the evaluation of sports achievements. However, there are few scientific and technological methods for the evaluation of sports technology. Track and discipline instructing is an extraordinarily complicated sport. The instructing of bodily schooling forte has accompanied the standard instructing technique for a lengthy time. The focus and evaluation of teaching are usually determined by teachers’ teaching experience. This teaching method is often blind and lack of pertinence and scientific. In order to improve the overall level of track and field system teaching, a scientific and reasonable quantitative mode can be adopted. This paper uses the improved algorithm of fuzzy set centre of gravity set to analyse the existing teaching. The algorithm offers fuzzy interval rating by means of comparison experts, calculates the centre of gravity of the endpoint of interval score, considers the weight of a number influencing elements and the authority of experts, and offers complete decision-making opinions. The algorithm makes full use of expert evaluation opinions and is easy to operate. Evaluation examples verify the scientific and accuracy of the algorithm. The results show that the algorithm conforms to the scoring law of track and field system teaching, has a certain practical effect on the objective evaluation of sports results, and can help teachers clearly understand students’ sports skills.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.