2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1009572919712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: Development of an effective rectal microbicide holds promise for HIV prevention. This study examined men's personal efficacy standards (i.e., preferences about product efficacy) for a future rectal microbicide and intentions to use it during anal intercourse. Three hundred eighty-five men who have sex with men, sampled in West Hollywood, completed a behavioral questionnaire, read a detailed description of a potential rectal microbicide gel, and expressed their preferences about product efficacy and intended us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings show significant associations of barebacking identity to serodiscordant unprotected insertive anal sex and suggest that encouraging harm-reduction strategies, in particular strategic positioning, may be an appropriate intervention technique to employ with self-identified barebacking MSM who may not respond to the prevention goal of completely eliminating unsafe sex. 12 Moreover, preceding studies have documented willingness to use rectal microbicides, 37,38 and postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) [39][40][41] among HIV seronegative MSM. Recent research has begun to explore the acceptability of alternative HIV biomedical products (microbicides, vaccines, PEP, and PrEP) with MSM who engage in unsafe sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings show significant associations of barebacking identity to serodiscordant unprotected insertive anal sex and suggest that encouraging harm-reduction strategies, in particular strategic positioning, may be an appropriate intervention technique to employ with self-identified barebacking MSM who may not respond to the prevention goal of completely eliminating unsafe sex. 12 Moreover, preceding studies have documented willingness to use rectal microbicides, 37,38 and postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) or pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) [39][40][41] among HIV seronegative MSM. Recent research has begun to explore the acceptability of alternative HIV biomedical products (microbicides, vaccines, PEP, and PrEP) with MSM who engage in unsafe sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%